Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Echo-intensity characterization at implant sites and novel diagnostic ultrasonographic markers for peri-implantitis.
Galarraga-Vinueza, Maria Elisa; Barootchi, Shayan; Mancini, Leonardo; Sabri, Hamoun; Schwarz, Frank; Gallucci, German O; Tavelli, Lorenzo.
Afiliación
  • Galarraga-Vinueza ME; Department of Prosthodontics, Tufts University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Barootchi S; School of Dentistry, Universidad de las Américas (UDLA), Quito, Ecuador.
  • Mancini L; Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Division of Periodontology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Sabri H; Department of Periodontics & Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Schwarz F; Center for Clinical Research and Evidence Synthesis In oral TissuE RegeneratION (CRITERION), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Gallucci GO; Department of Oral Medicine, Infection, and Immunity, Division of Periodontology, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Tavelli L; Center for Clinical Research and Evidence Synthesis In oral TissuE RegeneratION (CRITERION), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Clin Periodontol ; 2024 Apr 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561985
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To apply high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) echo intensity for characterizing peri-implant tissues at healthy and diseased sites and to investigate the possible ultrasonographic markers of health versus disease. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Sixty patients presenting 60 implants diagnosed as healthy (N = 30) and peri-implantitis (N = 30) were assessed with HFUS. HFUS scans were imported into a software where first-order greyscale outcomes [i.e., mean echo intensity (EI)] and second-order greyscale outcomes were assessed. Other ultrasonographic outcomes of interest involved the vertical extension of the hypoechoic supracrestal area (HSA), soft-tissue area (STA) and buccal bone dehiscence (BBD), among others.

RESULTS:

HFUS EI mean values obtained from peri-implant soft tissue at healthy and diseased sites were 122.9 ± 19.7 and 107.9 ± 24.7 grey levels (GL); p = .02, respectively. All the diseased sites showed the appearance of an HSA that was not present in healthy implants (area under the curve = 1). The proportion of HSA/STA was 37.9% ± 14.8%. Regression analysis showed that EI of the peri-implant soft tissue was significantly different between healthy and peri-implantitis sites (odds ratio 0.97 [95% confidence interval 0.94-0.99], p = .019).

CONCLUSIONS:

HFUS EI characterization of peri-implant tissues shows a significant difference between healthy and diseased sites. HFUS EI and the presence/absence of an HSA may be valid diagnostic ultrasonographic markers to discriminate peri-implant health status.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos