Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The employment of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in deployed settings.
Taheri, Branson D; Fisher, Andrew D; Eisenhauer, Ian F; April, Michael D; Rizzo, Julie A; Guliani, Sundeep S; Flarity, Kathleen M; Cripps, Michael; Bebarta, Vikhyat S; Wohlauer, Max V; Schauer, Steven G.
Afiliación
  • Taheri BD; Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Fisher AD; Air Education and Training Command, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, Ohio, USA.
  • Eisenhauer IF; University of Colorado Center for Combat Medicine and Battlefield (COMBAT) Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • April MD; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Rizzo JA; Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
  • Guliani SS; Texas Army National Guard, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Flarity KM; University of Colorado Center for Combat Medicine and Battlefield (COMBAT) Research, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Cripps M; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
  • Bebarta VS; Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado, USA.
  • Wohlauer MV; Navy Medicine Leader and Professional Development Command, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Schauer SG; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Transfusion ; 64 Suppl 2: S19-S26, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38581267
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been often used in place of open aortic occlusion for management of hemorrhagic shock in trauma. There is a paucity of data evaluating REBOA usage in military settings. STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS:

We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all cases with at least one intervention or assessment available within the first 72 h after injury between 2007 and 2023. We used relevant procedural codes to identify the use of REBOA within the DODTR, and we used descriptive statistics to characterize its use.

RESULTS:

We identified 17 cases of REBOA placed in combat settings from 2017 to 2019. The majority of these were placed in the operating room (76%) and in civilian patients (70%). A penetrating mechanism caused the injury in 94% of cases with predominantly the abdomen and extremities having serious injuries. All patients subsequently underwent an exploratory laparotomy after REBOA placement, with moderate numbers of patients having spleen, liver, and small bowel injuries. The majority (82%) of included patients survived to hospital discharge.

DISCUSSION:

We describe 17 cases of REBOA within the DODTR from 2007 to 2023, adding to the limited documentation of patients undergoing REBOA in military settings. We identified patterns of injury in line with previous studies of patients undergoing REBOA in military settings. In this small sample of military casualties, we observed a high survival rate.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aorta / Resucitación / Choque Hemorrágico / Oclusión con Balón / Procedimientos Endovasculares Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Transfusion Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aorta / Resucitación / Choque Hemorrágico / Oclusión con Balón / Procedimientos Endovasculares Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Transfusion Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos