Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Which self-reported measures are useful to explore diabetes support needs among adults with diabetes and severe mental illness?
Stenov, Vibeke; Willaing, Ingrid; Joensen, Lene Eide; Knudsen, Lenette; Andersen, Gregers Stig; Hansen, Dorte Lindqvist; Cleal, Bryan.
Afiliación
  • Stenov V; Department of Prevention, Health Promotion and Community Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Willaing I; Department of Prevention, Health Promotion and Community Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Joensen LE; Department of Prevention, Health Promotion and Community Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Knudsen L; Section of Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, Copenhagen University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Andersen GS; Department of Education, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Hansen DL; Clinical Epidemiological Research, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
  • Cleal B; Department of Diabetes Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Chronic Illn ; : 17423953241241762, 2024 Apr 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584462
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To construct and test patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for identifying diabetes support needs of adults with co-existing diabetes and severe mental illness (SMI) provided by mental health professionals at psychiatric outpatient clinics.

METHODS:

Design thinking was used to identify, select, and modify PROMs in collaboration with 18 adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and SMI and 10 healthcare experts. The PROMs were then tested with 86 adults with diabetes and SMI recruited from eight psychiatric outpatient clinics in Denmark. Data were analysed using systematic text condensation (questionnaire construction) and descriptive statistics (testing).

RESULTS:

Four principles for PROMs were identified (a) be modified to be relevant for the target group, (b) be concise and simple to complete, (c) have a clear and unambiguous wording, and (d) be designed to measure topics that are perceived as meaningful. Test of the questionnaire contained 49 items in four domains. Missing response rates in the test were 1.2-4.7% in three domains and 4.7-11.6% in a domain addressing potential sources of diabetes support.

DISCUSSION:

PROMs can successfully be constructed in collaboration with this vulnerable population that yield low rates of missing responses.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Chronic Illn Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Chronic Illn Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca