Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality of Life after Treatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Real-World Study: Recommendations, Vaginal Pessary, and Surgery.
Mancinskiene, Dominyka; Mikenaite, Migle; Barakat, Mark; Kacerauskiene, Justina; Railaite, Dalia Regina; Maleckiene, Laima; Bartusevicius, Arnoldas; Bartuseviciene, Egle.
Afiliación
  • Mancinskiene D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Mikenaite M; Faculty of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Barakat M; Faculty of Medicine, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Kacerauskiene J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Railaite DR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Maleckiene L; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Bartusevicius A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Bartuseviciene E; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, LT-44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(4)2024 Mar 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674193
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition in women, with its prevalence increasing with age, and can significantly impact the quality of life (QOL) of many individuals. The objective of this study was to assess the overall improvement, quality of life, and continuation of primary treatment for POP over a 24-month period in a real-world setting. Materials and

Methods:

This is a prospective, observational, follow-up study of women with symptomatic POP who, as a primary treatment, opted for recommendations (lifestyle changes and pelvic floor muscle training), pessary therapy, or surgery. The primary outcome measure was a subjective improvement at the 24-month follow-up, measured with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Secondary outcome measures were the continuation rate of the primary treatment method, reason for discontinuation, and the quality of life evaluated with the P-QoL questionnaire.

Results:

We included 137 women, with 45 women (32.8%) in the recommendations group, 39 (28.5%) in the pessary group, and 53 women (38.7%) in the surgery group. After 24 months, surgery, in comparison with pessary treatment and recommendations, resulted in significantly more women reporting a subjective improvement 89.6%, 66.7%, and 22.9% (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall, 52% of women from the recommendations group and 36.4% from the pessary group switched to another treatment or discontinued the primary treatment within 24 months. However, women who continued the primary treatment, pessary use, and surgery showed similar subjective improvements (90.5% and 89.6%, respectively) and quality-of-life improvement.

Conclusions:

The chance of significant improvement was higher following surgery. However, after 24 months, both vaginal pessaries and surgery showed an important quality-of life improvement and can be proposed as primary treatment methods for pelvic organ prolapse.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pesarios / Calidad de Vida / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Lituania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pesarios / Calidad de Vida / Prolapso de Órgano Pélvico Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Medicina (Kaunas) Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Lituania