Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Perioperative Cefazolin for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Who Have a Penicillin Allergy: Is It Safe?
Bukowski, Brandon R; Torres-Ramirez, Ricardo J; Devine, Daniel; Chiu, Yu-Fen; Carli, Alberto V; Maalouf, Daniel B; Goytizolo, Enrique A; Miller, Andy O; Rodriguez, Jose A.
Afiliación
  • Bukowski BR; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Torres-Ramirez RJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Devine D; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Chiu YF; Biostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Carli AV; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Maalouf DB; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Goytizolo EA; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Miller AO; Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
  • Rodriguez JA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
J Arthroplasty ; 2024 Apr 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677347
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cefazolin is the standard of care for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the United States. The potential allergic cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin causes uncertainty regarding optimal antibiotic choice in patients who have a reported penicillin allergy (rPCNA). The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of perioperative cefazolin in PCNA patients undergoing primary TJA.

METHODS:

We identified all patients (n = 49,842) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (n = 25,659) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 24,183) from 2016 to 2022 who received perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients who had an rPCNA (n = 5,508) who received cefazolin (n = 4,938, 89.7%) were compared to rPCNA patients who did not (n = 570, 10.3%), and to patients who did not have an rPCNA (n = 43,359). The primary outcome was the rate of allergic reactions within 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the rates of superficial infections, deep infections, and Clostridioides difficile infections within 90 days.

RESULTS:

The rate of allergic reactions was 0.1% (n = 5) in rPCNA patients who received cefazolin, compared to 0.2% (n = 1) in rPCNA patients who did not (P = .48) and 0.02% (n = 11) in patients who have no rPCNA (P = .02). Allergic reactions were mild in all 5 rPCNA patients who received cefazolin and were characterized by cutaneous symptoms (n = 4) or dyspnea in the absence of respiratory distress (n = 1) that resolved promptly with antibiotic discontinuation and administration of antihistamines and/or corticosteroids. We observed no differences in the rates of superficial infections (0.1 versus 0.2%, P = .58), deep infections (0.3 versus 0.4%, P = .68), or C difficile infections (0.04% versus 0%, P = .99) within 90 days in rPCNA patients who received cefazolin versus alternative perioperative antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this series of more than 5,500 patients who had an rPCNA undergoing primary TJA, perioperative prophylaxis with cefazolin resulted in a 0.1% incidence of allergic reactions that were clinically indolent. Cefazolin can be safely administered to most patients, independent of rPCNA severity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Asunto de la revista: ORTOPEDIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article