Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Crop rotational diversity can mitigate climate-induced grain yield losses.
Costa, Alessio; Bommarco, Riccardo; Smith, Monique E; Bowles, Timothy; Gaudin, Amélie C M; Watson, Christine A; Alarcón, Remedios; Berti, Antonio; Blecharczyk, Andrzej; Calderon, Francisco J; Culman, Steve; Deen, William; Drury, Craig F; Garcia Y Garcia, Axel; García-Díaz, Andrés; Hernández Plaza, Eva; Jonczyk, Krzysztof; Jäck, Ortrud; Navarrete Martínez, Luis; Montemurro, Francesco; Morari, Francesco; Onofri, Andrea; Osborne, Shannon L; Tenorio Pasamón, José Luis; Sandström, Boël; Santín-Montanyá, Inés; Sawinska, Zuzanna; Schmer, Marty R; Stalenga, Jaroslaw; Strock, Jeffrey; Tei, Francesco; Topp, Cairistiona F E; Ventrella, Domenico; Walker, Robin L; Vico, Giulia.
Afiliación
  • Costa A; Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Bommarco R; Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Smith ME; Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Bowles T; Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
  • Gaudin ACM; Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
  • Watson CA; Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Alarcón R; Scotland's Rural College, Aberdeen, UK.
  • Berti A; Agro-environmental Department, Madrid Institute for Rural, Agricultural and Food Research and Development, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
  • Blecharczyk A; Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Calderon FJ; Department of Agronomy, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
  • Culman S; Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon State University, Adams, Oregon, USA.
  • Deen W; School of Environment and Natural Resources, Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA.
  • Drury CF; Department of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  • Garcia Y Garcia A; Harrow Research and Development Centre, Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Harrow, Ontario, Canada.
  • García-Díaz A; Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics at the Southwest Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Lamberton, Minnesota, USA.
  • Hernández Plaza E; Agricultural and Food Research and Development, Applied Research Department, Madrid Institute for Rural, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
  • Jonczyk K; Department of Plant Protection, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Spanish National Research Council (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
  • Jäck O; Department of Systems and Economics of Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation - State Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland.
  • Navarrete Martínez L; Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Montemurro F; Agro-environmental Department, Madrid Institute for Rural, Agricultural and Food Research and Development, Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
  • Morari F; Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economy Analysis, Bari, Italy.
  • Onofri A; Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
  • Osborne SL; Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Tenorio Pasamón JL; North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Brookings, South Dakota, USA.
  • Sandström B; Environment and Agronomy Department, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Spanish National Research Council (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
  • Santín-Montanyá I; Department of Crop Production Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
  • Sawinska Z; Environment and Agronomy Department, National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Spanish National Research Council (INIA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
  • Schmer MR; Department of Agronomy, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
  • Stalenga J; Agroecosystem Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
  • Strock J; Department of Systems and Economics of Crop Production, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation - State Research Institute, Pulawy, Poland.
  • Tei F; Department of Soil, Water, and Climate at the Southwest Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Lamberton, Minnesota, USA.
  • Topp CFE; Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
  • Ventrella D; Scotland's Rural College, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Walker RL; Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CREA-AA), Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economy Analysis, Bari, Italy.
  • Vico G; Scotland's Rural College, Aberdeen, UK.
Glob Chang Biol ; 30(5): e17298, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712640
ABSTRACT
Diversified crop rotations have been suggested to reduce grain yield losses from the adverse climatic conditions increasingly common under climate change. Nevertheless, the potential for climate change adaptation of different crop rotational diversity (CRD) remains undetermined. We quantified how climatic conditions affect small grain and maize yields under different CRDs in 32 long-term (10-63 years) field experiments across Europe and North America. Species-diverse and functionally rich rotations more than compensated yield losses from anomalous warm conditions, long and warm dry spells, as well as from anomalous wet (for small grains) or dry (for maize) conditions. Adding a single functional group or crop species to monocultures counteracted yield losses from substantial changes in climatic conditions. The benefits of a further increase in CRD are comparable with those of improved climatic conditions. For instance, the maize yield benefits of adding three crop species to monocultures under detrimental climatic conditions exceeded the average yield of monocultures by up to 553 kg/ha under non-detrimental climatic conditions. Increased crop functional richness improved yields under high temperature, irrespective of precipitation. Conversely, yield benefits peaked at between two and four crop species in the rotation, depending on climatic conditions and crop, and declined at higher species diversity. Thus, crop species diversity could be adjusted to maximize yield benefits. Diversifying rotations with functionally distinct crops is an adaptation of cropping systems to global warming and changes in precipitation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cambio Climático / Productos Agrícolas / Zea mays País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cambio Climático / Productos Agrícolas / Zea mays País/Región como asunto: America do norte / Europa Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia