Which reference equation should we use for interpreting spirometry values for First Nations Australians? A cross-sectional study.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the suitability of the Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI)-2012 other/mixed and GLI-2022 global reference equations for evaluating the respiratory capacity of First Nations Australians. DESIGN, SETTING: Cross-sectional study; analysis of spirometry data collected by three prospective studies in Queensland, the Northern Territory, and Western Australia between March 2015 and December 2022. PARTICIPANTS: Opportunistically recruited First Nations participants in the Indigenous Respiratory Reference Values study (Queensland, Northern Territory; age, 3-25 years; 18 March 2015 - 24 November 2017), the Healthy Indigenous Lung Function Testing in Adults study (Queensland, Northern Territory; 18 years or older; 14 August 2019 - 15 December 2022) and the Many Healthy Lungs study (Western Australia; five years or older; 10 October 2018 - 7 November 2021). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Goodness of fit to spirometry data for each GLI reference equation, based on mean Z-score and its standard deviation, and proportions of participants with respiratory parameter values within 1.64 Z-scores of the mean value. RESULTS: Acceptable and repeatable forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) values were available for 2700 First Nations participants in the three trials; 1467 were classified as healthy and included in our analysis (1062 children, 405 adults). Their median age was 12 years (interquartile range, 9-19 years; range, 3-91 years), 768 (52%) were female, and 1013 were tested in rural or remote areas (69%). Acceptable and repeatable forced vital capacity (FVC) values were available for 1294 of the healthy participants (88%). The GLI-2012 other/mixed and GLI-2022 global equations provided good fits to the spirometry data; the race-neutral GLI-2022 global equation better accounted for the influence of ageing on FEV1 and FVC, and of height on FVC. Using the GLI-2012 other/mixed reference equation and after adjusting for age, sex, and height, mean FEV1 (estimated difference, -0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.46 to -0.22) and FVC Z-scores (estimated difference, -0.45; 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.32) were lower for rural or remote than for urban participants, but their mean FEV1/FVC Z-score was higher (estimated difference, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03-0.25). CONCLUSION: The normal spirometry values of healthy First Nations Australians may be substantially higher than previously reported. Until more spirometry data are available for people in urban areas, the race-neutral GLI-2022 global or the GLI-2012 other/mixed reference equations can be used when assessing the respiratory function of First Nations Australians.