Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Why do avian responses to change in Arctic green-up vary?
Tavera, Eveling A; Lank, David B; Douglas, David C; Sandercock, Brett K; Lanctot, Richard B; Schmidt, Niels M; Reneerkens, Jeroen; Ward, David H; Bêty, Joël; Kwon, Eunbi; Lecomte, Nicolas; Gratto-Trevor, Cheri; Smith, Paul A; English, Willow B; Saalfeld, Sarah T; Brown, Stephen C; Gates, H River; Nol, Erica; Liebezeit, Joseph R; McGuire, Rebecca L; McKinnon, Laura; Kendall, Steve; Robards, Martin; Boldenow, Megan; Payer, David C; Rausch, Jennie; Solovyeva, Diana V; Stalwick, Jordyn A; Gurney, Kirsty E B.
Afiliación
  • Tavera EA; University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Lank DB; Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Douglas DC; Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
  • Sandercock BK; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Lanctot RB; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
  • Schmidt NM; Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark.
  • Reneerkens J; Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Ward DH; Alaska Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
  • Bêty J; Université du Québec à Rimouski and Centre d'études nordiques, Rimouski, Quebec, Canada.
  • Kwon E; Max Planck Institute for Biological Intelligence, Seewiesen, Germany.
  • Lecomte N; Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.
  • Gratto-Trevor C; Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
  • Smith PA; Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • English WB; Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Saalfeld ST; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
  • Brown SC; Manomet Inc., Plymouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Gates HR; Manomet, Shorebird Recovery Program, Plymouth, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Nol E; Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
  • Liebezeit JR; Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada.
  • McGuire RL; Bird Alliance of Oregon, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • McKinnon L; ABR Inc., Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.
  • Kendall S; York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Robards M; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.
  • Boldenow M; Wildlife Conservation Society, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.
  • Payer DC; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
  • Rausch J; National Park Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
  • Solovyeva DV; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, Canada.
  • Stalwick JA; Institute of Biological Problems of the North, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Magadan, Russia.
  • Gurney KEB; Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Glob Chang Biol ; 30(5): e17335, 2024 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771086
ABSTRACT
Global climate change has altered the timing of seasonal events (i.e., phenology) for a diverse range of biota. Within and among species, however, the degree to which alterations in phenology match climate variability differ substantially. To better understand factors driving these differences, we evaluated variation in timing of nesting of eight Arctic-breeding shorebird species at 18 sites over a 23-year period. We used the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index as a proxy to determine the start of spring (SOS) growing season and quantified relationships between SOS and nest initiation dates as a measure of phenological responsiveness. Among species, we tested four life history traits (migration distance, seasonal timing of breeding, female body mass, expected female reproductive effort) as species-level predictors of responsiveness. For one species (Semipalmated Sandpiper), we also evaluated whether responsiveness varied across sites. Although no species in our study completely tracked annual variation in SOS, phenological responses were strongest for Western Sandpipers, Pectoral Sandpipers, and Red Phalaropes. Migration distance was the strongest additional predictor of responsiveness, with longer-distance migrant species generally tracking variation in SOS more closely than species that migrate shorter distances. Semipalmated Sandpipers are a widely distributed species, but adjustments in timing of nesting relative to variability in SOS did not vary across sites, suggesting that different breeding populations of this species were equally responsive to climate cues despite differing migration strategies. Our results unexpectedly show that long-distance migrants are more sensitive to local environmental conditions, which may help them to adapt to ongoing changes in climate.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estaciones del Año / Cambio Climático / Migración Animal / Comportamiento de Nidificación Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Estaciones del Año / Cambio Climático / Migración Animal / Comportamiento de Nidificación Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Glob Chang Biol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá