Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Temporal Dynamics of Adverse Effects across Five Sessions of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
Delicado-Miralles, Miguel; Flix-Diez, Laura; Gurdiel-Álvarez, Francisco; Velasco, Enrique; Galán-Calle, María; Lerma Lara, Sergio.
Afiliación
  • Delicado-Miralles M; Department of Pathology and Surgery, Center for Translational Research in Physiotherapy, Miguel Hernández University, Sant Joan d'Alacant, 03550 Alicante, Spain.
  • Flix-Diez L; Physiotherapy Faculty, Universidad de Valencia (UV), 46010 Valencia, Spain.
  • Gurdiel-Álvarez F; Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine University of Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Alcorcón, Spain.
  • Velasco E; Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.
  • Galán-Calle M; Health Sciences Faculty, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain.
  • Lerma Lara S; Health Sciences Faculty, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain.
Brain Sci ; 14(5)2024 Apr 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38790436
ABSTRACT
(1)

Background:

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe intervention, only producing mild and transient adverse effects (AEs). However, there is no detailed analysis of the pattern of adverse effects in an application transferable to the clinic. Therefore, our objective is to describe the AEs produced by tDCS and its temporal evolution. (2)

Methods:

A total of 33 young volunteers were randomized into a tDCS or sham group. Participants performed a hand dexterity task while receiving the tDCS or sham intervention (20 min and 1 mA), for five consecutive days. AEs were assessed daily after each intervention and classified as somatosensory, pain, or other effects. (3)

Results:

The number of AEs was generally increased by tDCS intervention. Specifically, tDCS led to more frequent somatosensory discomfort, characterized by sensations like itching and tingling, alongside painful sensations such as burning, compared to the sham intervention. Additionally, certain adverse events, including neck and arm pain, as well as dizziness and blurry vision, were exclusive to the tDCS group. Interestingly, tDCS produced similar AEs across the days; meanwhile, the somatosensory AEs in the sham group showed a trend to decrease. (4)

Conclusions:

tDCS produces mild and temporary somatosensory and pain AEs during and across sessions. The different evolution of the AEs between the tDCS and sham protocol could unmask the blinding protocol most used in tDCS studies. Potential solutions for improving blinding protocols for future studies are discussed.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Brain Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Brain Sci Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España