Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-Term Survival Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Surgery for Ileal Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Yogo, Akitada; Paciorek, Alan; Kasai, Yosuke; Moon, Farhana; Hirose, Kenzo; Corvera, Carlos U; Bergsland, Emily K; Nakakura, Eric K.
Afiliación
  • Yogo A; Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Paciorek A; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Kasai Y; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Moon F; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Hirose K; Department of Surgery, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
  • Corvera CU; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Bergsland EK; Division of Surgical Oncology, Section of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  • Nakakura EK; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 2024 May 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38797790
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ileal neuroendocrine tumors (i-NETs) are characterized by their multifocality and bulky mesenteric mass. Having shown that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) utilizing a hand-access port device has favorable short-term outcomes and achieves the goals of surgery for i-NETs, we sought to analyze long-term survival outcomes of MIS.

METHODS:

One hundred and sixty-eight patients who underwent resection of primary i-NETs at a single institution between January 2007 and February 2023 were retrospectively studied. Patients were categorized into the MIS or open surgery cohorts on an intention-to-treat basis. Open surgery was selected mainly based on the need for hepatectomy or bulky mesenteric mass resection. Overall survival was analyzed using log-rank tests with propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox proportional hazards regression. PSM was performed to reduce standardized mean differences of the variables to <0.2.

RESULTS:

Overall, 129 (77%) patients underwent MIS and 39 (23%) underwent open surgery. Twenty-seven MIS patients were converted to an open procedure. The median follow-up time was 49 months (interquartile range 23-87 months). In the PSM cohorts, overall survival did not differ significantly between the MIS and open surgery cohorts {median 99 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 91-not applicable [NA]) vs. 103 months (95% CI 86-NA), p = 0.77; hazard ratio 0.87 (95% CI 0.33-2.2), p = 0.77}.

CONCLUSIONS:

MIS is an alternative to open surgery for i-NETs, achieving similar short- and long-term oncological outcomes. Bulky mesenteric mass and a plan for concurrent liver resection are potential criteria for open surgery.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos