Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A scoping review protocol to map the evidence on the use of action research methodology by healthcare professionals and in healthcare team settings.
Roberts, Kinley; Casey, Mary; Coghlan, David; Cornall, Catherine; Hudson, Clare; Stokes, Diarmuid; Carroll, Aine.
Afiliación
  • Roberts K; National Rehabilitation Hospital, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, A96 E2H2, Ireland.
  • Casey M; School of Medicine and Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 C7X2, Ireland.
  • Coghlan D; School of Nursing Midwifery & Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 C7X2, Ireland.
  • Cornall C; Trinity Business School, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D02 F6N2, Ireland.
  • Hudson C; National Rehabilitation Hospital, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, A96 E2H2, Ireland.
  • Stokes D; National Rehabilitation Hospital, Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, A96 E2H2, Ireland.
  • Carroll A; UCD Library, University College Dublin, Dublin, D04 C7X2, Ireland.
HRB Open Res ; 4: 68, 2021.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38800821
ABSTRACT

Background:

Action research (AR) starts with an existing practical situation with which there is a concern or potential for improvement. It seeks transformative change through the simultaneous process of doing research and undertaking actions, both of which are linked together by a critical reflective process. It simultaneously allows one to systematically investigate a given social situation while promoting democratic change and collaborative participation. AR approaches have been used for many years in business management and education. More recently, AR has become an increasingly popular method of inquiry in healthcare, particularly in nursing, to investigate professional practice while simultaneously; introducing innovations; planning and undertaking action; and evaluating new ideas. The overall goal is to augment collaboration whilst improving the patient experience and outcomes.

Methods:

The Arksey and O'Malley methodology framework will be used to guide this scoping review process stage 1 will identify the research questions; the eligibility criteria and search strategy will be defined in stage 2; studies will then be selected in stage 3; data will be extracted and charted from these included studies in stage 4; stage 5 involves aggregating and summarising these results along with criteria relevant for health professionals and policy-makers. An optional consultation (stage 6) exercise may potentially be included.

Conclusion:

This scoping review will comprehensively map the evidence on the use of AR methodology by healthcare professionals and in healthcare team settings. It is predicted that the findings will inform researchers in carrying out future AR and highlight gaps in the literature. An article reporting the results of the completed scoping review will be submitted for publication to a scientific journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: HRB Open Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: HRB Open Res Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda