Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implant stability and clinical outcome between implant placement using internal sinus floor elevation with alloplastic bone material grafting and without grafting: A 1-year randomized clinical trial.
Sansupakorn, Arpapat; Khongkhunthian, Pathawee.
Afiliación
  • Sansupakorn A; Center of Excellence for Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, T. Suthep, A. Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
  • Khongkhunthian P; Center of Excellence for Dental Implantology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, T. Suthep, A. Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. pathaweek@gmail.com.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(6): 342, 2024 May 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801474
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare implant stability and clinical outcome in implant placement between osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) which consisted of 30% of hydroxyapatite (HA) and 70% of beta-tricalcium phosphate (ß -TCP) grafting material and OSFE without using bone grafting material. The research questions is whether the BCP provides any benefit in OSFE or not. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Thirty patients (30 implants) with a single edentulous area of upper premolar or molar were randomly separated into OSFE with BCP (n = 15) and OSFE without grafting (n = 15). The patients were reevaluated 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after implant loading. The clinical assessments (implant stability quotient (ISQ), implant survival-failure rate, and surgical complication) were analyzed. Together with radiographic assessments in 2D (endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG), mean marginal bone change (MMBC)) and 3D (endo-sinus bone gain in CBCT (ESBG-CT)) were evaluated, with a mean follow-up time of at least 12 months of functional loading and prosthetic complication.

RESULTS:

20 remaining implants (OSFE with BCP, n = 10; OSFE without grafting, n = 10) were analyzed. Mean ISQ was 79.18 ± 3.43 in 1-year follow-up (ISQ; OSFE with BCP = 78.72 ± 3.46, OSFE without grafting = 79.65 ± 3.52). ISQ in both groups increased steadily without significant differences in each follow-up. (p = 0.56). In radiographic evaluation, at 6-, 9-, and 12-month, OSFE without grafting group showed statistically significant lower MMBC (p < 0.05). The 1-year clinical results showed that 2 implants failed in OSFE with BCP, and 1 implant failed in OSFE without grafting.

CONCLUSIONS:

Graft material "BCP" (HA30TCP70) coupled with OSFE presents no extraordinary benefit in implant stability, clinical and radiographic outcome in 1-year follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Clinically, OSFE with grafting materials provides no additional benefit. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER TCTR20210517008 (date of registration May 17, 2021).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sustitutos de Huesos / Implantación Dental Endoósea / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Elevación del Piso del Seno Maxilar / Hidroxiapatitas Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Sustitutos de Huesos / Implantación Dental Endoósea / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico / Elevación del Piso del Seno Maxilar / Hidroxiapatitas Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Investig Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Tailandia