Diagnostic potential of protein serum biomarkers for distinguishing small and non-small cell lung cancer in patients with suspicious lung lesions.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biomarkers play a role in identifying, managing, and predicting cancer outcomes. In lung cancer, they are used at various time points. Doubts remain regarding their accuracy for differential diagnosis and histological subtyping. A diagnostic test study was conducted. It included malignant lesions and controls with benign lesions. Before lung biopsy, all patients had the following biomarkers measured in serum (Pro-GRP,NSE,CYFRA21-1,SCC-Ag,CEA). METHODS: The predictive capacity of serum biomarkers was evaluated to discriminate between lung cancer and benign pathology. The accuracy was also assessed for distinguishing between SCLC and NSCLC and explored their ability to perform histological subtyping. RESULTS: 93 patients were included, 60 with lung cancer, 33 with benign pathology. Pro-GRP and NSE were elevated in SCLC compared with NSCLC or nonmalignant disease. The most accurate for differentiating between malignant and benign pathology were CEA and CYFRA21-1. Pro-GRP had a poor predictive capacity for distinguishing NSCLC from SCLC. However, combined with CEA and CYFRA21-1, performance improved. For SCLC, the diagnostic capacity of Pro-GRP increased by combining with biomarkers, such as NSE/CYFRA21-1. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers lacked the sensitivity and specificity for independent differential diagnosis or histological subtyping. However, the observed patterns in biomarker levels associated with specific histological subtypes suggest potential utility in a multi-biomarker approach or in conjunction with other diagnostic tools. This insight could guide future research to improve diagnostic accuracy and personalized treatment strategies in lung cancer.

Biomarkers are crucial for identifying, managing, and predicting outcomes in lung cancer, though they lack accuracy in differentiating histological subtypes.CEA and CYFRA21-1 were the most accurate biomarkers for distinguishing between malignant and benign pathology.Pro-GRP and NSE levels were elevated in SCLC compared to NSCLC. Pro-GRP alone had poor predictive capacity for differentiating NSCLC from SCLC, but combining it with CEA and CYFRA21-1 improved diagnostic performance.Patterns in biomarker levels suggest that a multi-biomarker approach, especially when combined with other diagnostic tools, could improve diagnostic accuracy.