Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Refractive power profiles of commercially available soft multifocal contact lenses for myopia control.
Dang, Rebecca M; Ehrmann, Klaus; Jalbert, Isabelle; Hui, Alex; Kang, Pauline.
Afiliación
  • Dang RM; School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ehrmann K; School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Jalbert I; Nthalmic Pty Ltd, Botany, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Hui A; School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Kang P; School of Optometry and Vision Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt ; 44(6): 1202-1214, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38818867
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Lens power profiles can provide valuable insights on the imposed optical defocus and visual experience of contact lens wearers, especially in the context of myopia control. This study measured the refractive power profiles of multifocal soft contact lenses (MFCLs) currently used or that have the potential for use in myopia control using high spatial resolution aberrometry. The instrument's repeatability for determining MFCLs power profiles was also assessed.

METHOD:

The power profiles of 10 MFCLs of various designs (centre-distance, centre-near and extended depth of focus) were measured using the Lambda-X NIMOEVO, a phase shifting Schlieren-based device. Power profiles were graphically expressed as measured power at each chord position and the maximum add power was calculated. The repeatability of the NIMOEVO was expressed as the within-subject standard deviation at each chord position for a subset of five MFCLs.

RESULTS:

The measured distance powers differed from nominal powers for more than half of the MFCLs with a definable distance zone. There were variations in the chord position of the distance and near correction zones, rate of power transitions and calculated maximum add between the MFCLs which did not depend on lens design. For half of the MFCLs, the power profile shape was inconsistent between different nominal back vertex powers of the same design. The repeatability of the NIMOEVO was dependent on the lens design, with designs featuring faster rates of power change exhibiting worse repeatability.

CONCLUSIONS:

Significant differences in MFCL power profiles were found which were not adequately represented in labelling. This is likely due to the small number of parameters used to define lens power characteristics. Eye health care practitioners should be aware of potential differences in power profiles between different MFCLs, which will impact the retinal defocus introduced during lens wear and the wearer's visual experience.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Lentes de Contacto Hidrofílicos / Miopía Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Refracción Ocular / Lentes de Contacto Hidrofílicos / Miopía Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia