Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sonography in the diagnosis of peri-implant bone defects: An in vitro study on native human mandibles.
Bykhovsky, Igor; Hildner, Alexander; Kripfgans, Oliver D; Mengel, Reiner.
Afiliación
  • Bykhovsky I; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg/Lahn, Marburg/Lahn, Germany.
  • Hildner A; Alcedis GmbH, Giessen, Germany.
  • Kripfgans OD; Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Mengel R; Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg/Lahn, Marburg/Lahn, Germany.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 35(9): 1128-1137, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38837465
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The aim of this study on native human cadavers was to compare clinical, sonographic, and radiological measurements of fenestrations, dehiscences, and 3-wall bone defects on implants. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The examination was carried out on five human mandibles. After the insertion of 27 implants, dehiscences (n = 14), fenestrations (n = 7) and 3-wall bone defects (n = 6) were prepared in a standardized manner. The direct measurement of the bone defects was carried out with a periodontal probe and the radiological examination was carried out using digital volume tomography (DVT). The ultrasound examination (US) was performed using a clinical 24-MHz US imaging probe. Means and standard deviations of the direct, US, and DVT measurements were calculated. Measurements were statistically compared using the Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS:

Bone defects were on average 3.22 ± 1.58 mm per direct measurement, 2.90 ± 1.47 mm using US, and 2.99 ± 1.52 mm per DVT assessment. Pairwise correlations of these measurements were R = .94 (p < .0001) between direct and US, R = .95 (p < .0001) between DVT and US, and R = .96 (p < .0001) between direct and DVT. The mean differences of the measurements (and 95% CI) between direct and US was 0.41 (-0.47 to 1.29), US and DVT 0.33 (-0.30 to 0.97), and direct and DVT 0.28 (-0.50 to 1.07).

CONCLUSION:

All peri-implant bone defects could be identified and sonographically measured. US measurements showed a strong correlation with direct and DVT measurements. The sonographic measurement accuracy was highest for dehiscences, followed by fenestrations and 3-wall bone defects.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cadáver / Implantes Dentales / Ultrasonografía / Mandíbula Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cadáver / Implantes Dentales / Ultrasonografía / Mandíbula Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Oral Implants Res Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania