Is Lobectomy Actually Worse Than Segmentectomy for All Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The recent results of the JCOG 0802 and CALGB 140503 studies suggest that segmentectomy should be considered instead of lobectomy for patients with peripheral <2 cm node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to test this hypothesis in a retrospective analysis of a larger dataset of patients with stage I NSCLC recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. METHODS: Patients with all stage I NSCLC (≤4 cm in size) who underwent either segmentectomy or lobectomy from 2000 to 2017 were analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival and lung cancer-specific survival, while the secondary endpoints were the 30-day and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 32,673 patients treated by lobectomy and 2166 patients treated by segmentectomy were included in the initial data collection. After 11 propensity score matching (PSM), 2016 patients in each group were enrolled in the final analysis with well-balanced baseline characteristics. After PSM, there was no difference between segmentectomy and lobectomy for all stage IA NSCLC (≤3 cm in size) in both overall survival and lung cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 0.87 [0.74-1.02], P value 0.09 and hazard ratio 0.81 [0.4-1.03], P value 0.09, respectively). Furthermore, lobectomy had higher 30-day mortality than segmentectomy 1.1% versus 2.1%, P value 0.01. However, this difference was not significant for 90-day mortality, even after PSM (3.9% versus 3.0%, P value 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to support the use of lobectomy rather than segmentectomy in stage IA NSCLC in terms of either overall or lung cancer-specific long-term survival. The choice of lobectomy may also be detrimental to early postoperative recovery.