Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The allied health rural generalist pathway: a cost consequence analysis.
Dymmott, Alison; Brebner, Chris; George, Stacey; Campbell, Narelle; May, Jodie; Gill, Robyn; Milte, Rachel.
Afiliación
  • Dymmott A; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Brebner C; Flinders University, Sturt Campus, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.
  • George S; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Campbell N; Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • May J; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University Northern Territory, Darwin, NT, Australia.
  • Gill R; Rural Support Service, SA Health, PO Box 3017, Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
  • Milte R; Rural Support Service, SA Health, PO Box 3017, Rundle Mall, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Rural Remote Health ; 24(2): 8557, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872279
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Rural and remote health workforces face longstanding challenges in Australia. Little is known about the economic effectiveness of workforce initiatives to increase recruitment and retention. A two-level allied health rural generalist pathway was introduced as a workforce strategy in regional local health networks (LHNs) in South Australia in 2019. This research measured the resources and outcomes of the pathway following its introduction.

METHODS:

A multi-phase, mixed-methods study was conducted with a 3-year follow-up period (2019-2022). A cost-consequence analysis was conducted as part of this study. Resources measured included tuition, time for quarantined study, supervision and support, and program manager salary. Outcomes measured included length of tenure, turnover data, career progression, service development time, confidence and competence.

RESULTS:

Fifteen allied health professional trainees participated in the pathway between 2019 and 2022 and seven completed during this time. Trainees participated for between 3 and 42 months. The average total cost of supporting a level 1 trainee was $34,875 and level 2 was $70,469. The total return on investment within the evaluation period was $317,610 for the level 1 program and $58,680 for the level 2 program. All seven completing trainees continued to work in regional LHNs at the 6-month follow-up phase and confidence and competence to work as a rural generalist increased.

CONCLUSION:

This research found that the allied health rural generalist pathway has the potential to generate multiple positive outcomes for a relatively small investment and is therefore likely to be a cost-effective workforce initiative.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Rural / Técnicos Medios en Salud Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Rural Remote Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios de Salud Rural / Técnicos Medios en Salud Límite: Female / Humans / Male País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Rural Remote Health Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia