Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Longitudinal Examination of Swallowing Safety and Vocal Fold Mobility in Cardiac Surgical Patients.
Donohue, Cara; Wiele, Lauren; Terry, Alyssa; Jeng, Eric; Beaver, Thomas; Martin, Tomas; Chheda, Neil; Plowman, Emily K.
Afiliación
  • Donohue C; Aerodigestive Research Core Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Wiele L; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Terry A; Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Jeng E; Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
  • Beaver T; Aerodigestive Research Core Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Martin T; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Chheda N; Aerodigestive Research Core Laboratory, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
  • Plowman EK; Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep ; 2(2): 297-301, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38872831
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Aspiration and vocal fold mobility impairment (VFMI) are frequently reported in adults after cardiac surgery (CS) and impede recovery. Preoperative and postoperative laryngoscopic evaluations have not been undertaken, masking the incidence and evolution of dysphagia and VFMI in CS patients. We therefore sought to determine frequency of unsafe swallowing and VFMI before and after CS.

METHODS:

Thirty-five adults undergoing elective CS enrolled. Participants underwent fiberoptic endoscopic evaluations of swallowing and VFMI before and after surgical procedure. Trained raters performed duplicate, blinded ratings with the validated Penetration-Aspiration Scale, and a laryngologist performed blinded ratings of VFMI. Descriptive, Wilcoxon signed rank, and McNemar tests were performed.

RESULTS:

Preoperative swallowing safety profiles were 60% safe, 34% penetration, and 6% aspiration. Postoperative swallowing safety profiles were 14% safe, 63% penetration, and 23% aspiration. Significant differences in preoperative to postoperative swallowing outcomes were noted for Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores (P < .0001), unsafe swallowing (40% vs 86%; χ2 = 12.8; P = .0003), and aspiration (6% vs 23%; χ2 =6; P = .01). No differences in VFMI were noted preoperatively to postoperatively (partial VFMI, 9% vs 23%; P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

A 4-fold increase in aspiration was observed in CS patients. No cases of vocal fold paralysis were observed across time points. These data highlight the utility of instrumental laryngoscopic evaluations during the acute postoperative phase.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article