Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparative analysis of sivelestat sodium hydrate and ulinastatin combination therapy in the treatment of sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Xu, Jian; Zhang, Chenfei; Wu, Keren; Qian, Yanhua; Hu, Wei.
Afiliación
  • Xu J; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Wuxi Fifth Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214000, Jiangsu, China.
  • Zhang C; Wuxi Medical College of Jiangnan University, No. 1215, Guangrui Road, Liangxi District, Wuxi, 214000, Jiangsu, China.
  • Wu K; Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, 325035, Zhejiang, China.
  • Qian Y; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the 904 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Wuxi, 214000, Jiangsu, China.
  • Hu W; Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Wuxi Fifth Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214000, Jiangsu, China. Qianyanhua9025@163.com.
BMC Pulm Med ; 24(1): 283, 2024 Jun 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886709
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This comparative analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy of Sivelestat Sodium Hydrate (SSH) combined with Ulinastatin (UTI) in the treatment of sepsis with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

METHODS:

A control group and an observation group were formed with eighty-four cases of patients with sepsis with ARDS, with 42 cases in each group. The control group was intravenously injected with UTI based on conventional treatment, and the observation group was injected with SSH based on the control group. Both groups were treated continuously for 7 days, and the treatment outcomes and efficacy of both groups were observed. The Murray Lung Injury Score (MLIS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) were compared. Changes in respiratory function, inflammatory factors, and oxidative stress indicators were assessed. The occurrence of adverse drug reactions was recorded.

RESULTS:

The total effective rate in the observation group (95.24%) was higher than that in the control group (80.95%) (P < 0.05). The mechanical ventilation time, intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization time, and duration of antimicrobial medication in the observation group were shorter and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome incidence was lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The mortality rate of patients in the observation group (35.71%) was lower than that in the control group (52.38%), but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). MLIS, SOFA, and APACHE II scores in the observation group were lower than the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, respiratory function, inflammation, and oxidative stress were improved in the observation group (P < 0.05). Adverse reactions were not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The combination of SSH plus UTI improves lung injury and pulmonary ventilation function, and reduces inflammation and oxidative stress in patients with sepsis and ARDS.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / Sulfonamidas / Glicoproteínas / Sepsis / Quimioterapia Combinada / Glicina Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pulm Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria / Sulfonamidas / Glicoproteínas / Sepsis / Quimioterapia Combinada / Glicina Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pulm Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China