Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the criteria for renewal of LHRH agonists in patients with prostate cancer: results of the ANAREN Study.
Calleja-Escudero, Jesús; Barrondo, Víctor; Rodriguez-Alonso, Andrés; Gómez-Veiga, Francisco; Bestard, Joan; Gómez-Caamaño, Antonio; Grandoulier, Anne-Sophie; Pérez-Sampietro, Maria; Chantada-Abal, Venancio; Poza de Celis, Raúl.
Afiliación
  • Calleja-Escudero J; Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
  • Barrondo V; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Spain.
  • Rodriguez-Alonso A; Department of Urology, Hospital Arquitecto Macide, Ferrol, Spain.
  • Gómez-Veiga F; Department of Urology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
  • Bestard J; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
  • Gómez-Caamaño A; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Son Llàtzer, Palma, Spain.
  • Grandoulier AS; Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
  • Pérez-Sampietro M; Ipsen Pharma, S.A.U., Barcelona, Spain.
  • Chantada-Abal V; Ipsen Pharma, S.A.U., Barcelona, Spain.
  • Poza de Celis R; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Drugs Context ; 132024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38915919
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Injectable extended-release formulations of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) have simplified the treatment of prostate cancer with a satisfactory level of androgen castration. This study aims to determine the percentage of patients whose initial LHRHa prescription was renewed during follow-up, how many changed formulation and how their quality of life evolved.

Methods:

This is an observational, prospective, multicentre study of men with prostate cancer who were to receive treatment with LHRHa (triptorelin every 3 or 6 months, leuprorelin every 3 or 6 months, or goserelin every 3 months) for 24 months. The treatment used was recorded and quality of life was assessed (QLQ-PR25 questionnaire) at four follow-up visits.

Results:

A total of 497 men (median age 75 years) were evaluated. The median exposure to LHRHa was 24 months. The initial prescription was renewed in 95.7% at follow-up 1 and 75% at follow-up 4. The main reason for changing from a 6-month to a 3-month formulation was a preference for sequential treatment (according to the investigator) and to see the physician more frequently (according to the patient). The main reason for switching from the 3-month to 6-month formulation was simplification of treatment (according to the investigator) and for convenience (according to the patient). Findings in the QLQ-PR25 questionnaire revealed no changes in urinary or bowel symptoms, though an improvement in sexual activity was reported. Practically all investigators and patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the treatment.

Conclusion:

Changes in formulation were scarce and generally justified by convenience factors or personal preferences. Patients maintained a good health status, with a high rate of retention of LHRHa treatment. Clinical Trial Registration Study number A-ES-52014-224.A plain language summary is provided as supplementary material (available at https//www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/dic.2024-2-2-Suppl.pdf).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Drugs Context Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Drugs Context Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España