Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding Barriers to Guideline-Concordant Treatment in Foregut Cancer: From Data to Solutions.
Fonseca, Annabelle L; Ahmad, Rida; Amin, Krisha; Tripathi, Manish; Abdalla, Ahmed; Hearld, Larry; Bhatia, Smita; Heslin, Martin J.
Afiliación
  • Fonseca AL; Department of Surgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. afonseca@uabmc.edu.
  • Ahmad R; Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. afonseca@uabmc.edu.
  • Amin K; Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
  • Tripathi M; Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
  • Abdalla A; Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Hearld L; Department of Surgery, The University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
  • Bhatia S; Department of Health Services Administration, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
  • Heslin MJ; Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 2024 Jul 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38954093
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A large proportion of patients with foregut cancers do not receive guideline-concordant treatment (GCT). This study sought to understand underlying barriers to GCT through a root cause analysis approach.

METHODS:

A single-institution retrospective review of 498 patients with foregut (gastric, pancreatic, and hepatobiliary) adenocarcinoma from 2018 to 2022 was performed. Guideline-concordant treatment was defined based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The Ishikawa cause and effect model was used to establish main contributing factors to non-GCT.

RESULTS:

Overall, 34% did not receive GCT. Root causes of non-GCT included Patient, Physician, Institutional Environment and Broader System-related factors. In decreasing order of frequency, the following contributed to non-GCT receipt of incomplete therapy (N = 28, 16.5%), deconditioning on chemotherapy (N = 26, 15.3%), delays in care because of patient resource constraints followed by loss to follow-up (N = 19, 11.2%), physician factors (N = 19, 11.2%), no documentation of treatment plan after referral to oncologic expertise (N = 19, 11.2%), loss to follow-up before oncology referral (N = 17, 10%), nonreferral to medical oncologic expertise (N = 16, 9.4%), nonreferral to surgical oncology in patients with resectable disease (N = 15, 8.8%), and complications preventing completion of treatment (N = 11, 6.5%). Non-GCT often was a function of multiple intersecting patient, physician, and institutional factors.

CONCLUSIONS:

A substantial percentage of patients with foregut cancer do not receive GCT. Solutions that may improve receipt of GCT include development of automated systems to improve patient follow-up; institutional prioritization of resources to enhance staffing; financial counseling and assistance programs; and development and integration of structured prehabilitation programs into cancer treatment pathways.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos