Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recognition of psychological comorbidity and psychotherapeutic treatment status of ventricular assist device patients.
Gronewold, Nadine; Mayer, Gwendolyn; Müller, Yvonne; Levinson, Rebecca T; Bruns, Bastian; Meyer, Anna L; Rivinius, Rasmus; Frey, Norbert; Kreusser, Michael M; Schultz, Jobst-Hendrik.
Afiliación
  • Gronewold N; Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Mayer G; Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Müller Y; Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Levinson RT; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Bruns B; Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Meyer AL; Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Rivinius R; Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Frey N; Institute of Experimental Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Kreusser MM; Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schultz JH; Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Artif Organs ; 2024 Jul 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984611
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Due to its high impact on quality of life and mental health, close monitoring and often psychotherapy is recommended for patients with a ventricular assist device (VAD). This study investigates the psychological comorbidity and the corresponding psychotherapeutic treatment situation of VAD patients. Special attention is also given to the professional perspective VAD team (assistant and senior cardiologists and specialized nurses).

METHODS:

We conducted a cross-sectional observational study. Data from 50 VAD patients (mean age = 53.52, standard deviation = 13.82 years, 84.0% male) and their VAD team were analyzed. The presence of a psychological disorder was evaluated by structured clinical interviews for DSM-IV (SCID-I-Interviews). Patients answered a questionnaire regarding their current psychotherapeutic treatment status and their attitude towards psychotherapy. The VAD team answered a questionnaire about the patients' needs for psychotherapy and indicated whether they addressed this topic with the patient. Data were analyzed descriptively, by analysis of variance and t-test.

RESULTS:

A total of 58% of VAD patients suffered from at least one significant psychological disorder, 79.3% of those were not in psychotherapy. The VAD team could not identify the patients who suffered from a psychological disorder (F = 1.90; p = 0.18). They perceived more need for psychotherapy than they addressed with their patients (T = 3.39; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

While there is a high psychological morbidity among VAD patients, only few receive psychotherapy. Psychological comorbidity is not easily detected by the VAD team. Standardized psychosocial care could be implemented by regular psychological assessments and further information of patients and their VAD teams.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Artif Organs Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Artif Organs Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania