Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early clinical and quality impacts of the Age-Friendly Health System in a Veterans Affairs skilled nursing facility.
King, Sarah E; Ruopp, Marcus D; Mac, Chi T; O'Malley, Kelly A; Meyerson, Jordana L; Lefers, Lindsay; Bean, Jonathan F; Driver, Jane A; Schwartz, Andrea Wershof.
Afiliación
  • King SE; Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ruopp MD; Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Mac CT; Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • O'Malley KA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Meyerson JL; Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Lefers L; Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Bean JF; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Driver JA; New England Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, USA.
  • Schwartz AW; Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 2024 Jul 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39007623
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are an ideal setting to implement the Age-Friendly Health System (AFHS) approach, an initiative by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) centered on the 4Ms what matters, mobility, mentation, and medication. AFHS implementation has not been well studied in SNFs.

METHODS:

A 112-bed VA SNF implemented a facility-wide AFHS initiative including the following (1) participating in a national IHI Age-Friendly Action Community; (2) establishing an AFHS workgroup centered on the 4Ms; (3) identifying meaningful clinical tools and frameworks for capturing each M; and (4) developing sustainment methods. Clinical (life-sustaining treatment, falls, disruptive behaviors, and medication deprescribing) and quality outcomes (rehospitalization, emergency department utilization, and discharge to the community) in addition to patient satisfaction were compared pre- and post-AFHS implementation (bed days of care [BDOC] 17413) to post-implementation (BDOC 20880).

RESULTS:

Clinical outcomes demonstrated improvements in the 4Ms, including (1) what matters 14% increase in life-sustaining treatment documentation (82%-96%; p < 0.01); (2) mobility reduction in fall rate by 34% (8.15 falls/1000 BDOC to 5.41; p < 0.01); (3) mentation decrease in disruptive behavior reporting system (DBRS) by 62% (5.11 DBRS/1000 BDOC to 1.96; p = 0.04); (4) medications 53% increase in average potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) deprescribing (0.38-0.80 interventions/patient; p < 0.01). Quality outcomes improved including rehospitalization (25.6%-17.9%) and emergency department utilization (5.3%-2.8%) within 30 days of admission. Patient satisfaction scores improved from a mean of 77.2 (n = 31, scale 1-100) to 81.3 (n = 42).

CONCLUSIONS:

Implementation of the AFHS initiative in a SNF was associated with improved clinical and quality outcomes and patient satisfaction. We describe here a sustainable, interprofessional approach to implementing the AFHS in a SNF.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Am Geriatr Soc Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Am Geriatr Soc Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos