Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP During General Anesthesia for Surgery - a Bayesian individual patient data meta-analysis of three randomized clinical trials.
Mazzinari, Guido; Zampieri, Fernando G; Ball, Lorenzo; Campos, Niklas S; Bluth, Thomas; Hemmes, Sabrine Nt; Ferrando, Carlos; Librero, Julian; Soro, Marina; Pelosi, Paolo; Gama de Abreu, Marcelo; Schultz, Marcus J; Serpa Neto, Ary.
Afiliación
  • Mazzinari G; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
  • Zampieri FG; Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
  • Ball L; Department of Statistics and Operational Research, Universidad de Valencia, Calle Dr. Moliner, 50. 46100 Burjassot (Valencia), Spain.
  • Campos NS; PROtective VEntilation Network, https://www.provenetwork.org/home.
  • Bluth T; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services , 2-124 Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G3.
  • Hemmes SN; IRCCS San Martino Policlinico Hospital, Largo Rosanna Benzi, 10, 16132 Genova, Italy.
  • Ferrando C; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 2° piano 16132 Genova, Italy.
  • Librero J; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701 - Morumbi, São Paulo - SP, 05652-900, Brasil.
  • Soro M; Cardio-Pulmonary Department, Pulmonary Division, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clinicas HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidad de de Sao Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 44 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo - SP, 05403-900, Brasil.
  • Pelosi P; Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
  • Gama de Abreu M; Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Schultz MJ; Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location 'AMC', Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Serpa Neto A; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut D'investigació August Pi i Sunyer, C/ del Rosselló, 149, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Anesthesiology ; 2024 Jul 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39042027
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The influence of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with recruitment maneuvers on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications after surgery is still not definitively established. Bayesian analysis can help to gain further insights from the available data and provide a probabilistic framework that is easier to interpret. Our objective was to estimate the posterior probability that the use of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers is associated with reduced postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with intermediate-to-high risk under neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations regarding the treatment effect.

METHODS:

Multilevel Bayesian logistic regression analysis on individual patient data from three randomized clinical trials carried out on surgical patients at Intermediate-to-High Risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The main outcome was the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications in the early postoperative period. We studied the effect of high PEEP with recruitment maneuvers versus Low PEEP Ventilation. Priors were chosen to reflect neutral, pessimistic, and optimistic expectations of the treatment effect.

RESULTS:

Using a neutral, pessimistic, or optimistic prior, the posterior mean odds ratio (OR) for High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers compared to Low PEEP was 0.85 (95% Credible Interval [CrI] 0.71 to 1.02), 0.87 (0.72 to 1.04), and 0.86 (0.71 to 1.02), respectively. Regardless of prior beliefs, the posterior probability of experiencing a beneficial effect exceeded 90%. Subgroup analysis indicated a more pronounced effect in patients who underwent laparoscopy (OR 0.67 [0.50 to 0.87]) and those at high risk for PPCs (OR 0.80 [0.53 to 1.13]). Sensitivity analysis, considering severe postoperative pulmonary complications only or applying a different heterogeneity prior, yielded consistent results.

CONCLUSION:

High PEEP with recruitment maneuvers demonstrated a moderate reduction in the probability of PPC occurrence, with a high posterior probability of benefit observed consistently across various prior beliefs, particularly among patients who underwent laparoscopy.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Anesthesiology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Anesthesiology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España