Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of generative language systems in increasing patient awareness of colon cancer screening.
Maida, Marcello; Ramai, Daryl; Mori, Yuichi; Dinis-Ribeiro, Mário; Facciorusso, Antonio; Hassan, Cesare.
Afiliación
  • Maida M; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore," Enna, Italy.
  • Ramai D; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
  • Mori Y; Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Dinis-Ribeiro M; Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Facciorusso A; Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center & RISE@CI-IPO, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  • Hassan C; Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Endoscopy ; 2024 Oct 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39142348
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT (Chat Generative Pretrained Transformer) in answering patients' questions about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, with the ultimate goal of enhancing patients' awareness and adherence to national screening programs.

METHODS:

15 questions on CRC screening were posed to ChatGPT4. The answers were rated by 20 gastroenterology experts and 20 nonexperts in three domains (accuracy, completeness, and comprehensibility), and by 100 patients in three dichotomic domains (completeness, comprehensibility, and trustability).

RESULTS:

According to expert rating, the mean (SD) accuracy score was 4.8 (1.1), on a scale ranging from 1 to 6. The mean (SD) scores for completeness and comprehensibility were 2.1 (0.7) and 2.8 (0.4), respectively, on scales ranging from 1 to 3. Overall, the mean (SD) accuracy (4.8 [1.1] vs. 5.6 [0.7]; P < 0.001) and completeness scores (2.1 [0.7] vs. 2.7 [0.4]; P < 0.001) were significantly lower for the experts than for the nonexperts, while comprehensibility was comparable among the two groups (2.8 [0.4] vs. 2.8 [0.3]; P = 0.55). Patients rated all questions as complete, comprehensible, and trustable in between 97 % and 100 % of cases.

CONCLUSIONS:

ChatGPT shows good performance, with the potential to enhance awareness about CRC and improve screening outcomes. Generative language systems may be further improved after proper training in accordance with scientific evidence and current guidelines.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Endoscopy Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Endoscopy Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia