Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research?
O'Sullivan, Patricia; Kuper, Ayelet; Cleland, Jennifer.
Afiliación
  • O'Sullivan P; University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA. Patricia.OSullivan@ucsf.edu.
  • Kuper A; Wilson Centre for Research in Education, Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Cleland J; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University Singapore, Nanyang Ave, Singapore, Singapore.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract ; 29(4): 1071-1073, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39186166
ABSTRACT
This column is intended to address the kinds of knotty problems and dilemmas with which many scholars grapple in studying health professions education. In this article, the authors focus on how to help mentees take an analytic approach to improve their mixed methods work. Mixed methods research has increased in popularity and with that comes both strengths and weaknesses in these studies. We suggest key elements to look for when reading a mixed methods research paper. We also provide guidance around weaknesses we have noticed in reporting.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Proyectos de Investigación Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Asunto de la revista: EDUCACAO / SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos