Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rhytidectomy Incision Techniques and Scar Outcomes: A Scoping Review.
Liu, Katherine; Chou, David W; Verma, Hannah; Sehgal, Gavneet; Gregory, Jill; Gidumal, Sunder; Husain, Solomon; Kontis, Theda; Abraham, Manoj.
Afiliación
  • Liu K; Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
  • Chou DW; Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, United States.
  • Verma H; Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
  • Sehgal G; Otolaryngology, Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, United States.
  • Gregory J; Medical Illustration, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
  • Gidumal S; Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
  • Husain S; Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, United States.
  • Kontis T; Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, United States.
  • Abraham M; Otolaryngology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, United States.
Facial Plast Surg ; 2024 Aug 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39191413
ABSTRACT
Although scar outcomes in rhytidectomy are crucial to patients and surgeons alike, there is a lack of consensus on incision techniques for optimizing rhytidectomy scars. A comprehensive scoping review of the literature was performed on rhytidectomy incision techniques and associated scar outcomes. PRISMA protocol was utilized to conduct a scoping review of the literature through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index databases to identify articles discussing rhytidectomy incision techniques and scar outcomes. 49 studies were included in this scoping review. 4 themes were identified related to rhytidectomy scars within these studies temporal incision placement, tragal incision placement, lobule management, and postauricular incision design. Techniques within each theme were described and reported scar outcomes summarized. There are many approaches to rhytidectomy incisions described in the literature, with reportedly low rates of scar complications for each of the techniques described. It cannot be elucidated which techniques are superior due to the heterogeneity of outcomes reported in the literature with significant variability in outcome measures, study design and follow up time. Future studies should focus on utilizing a standardized rating system to aid in objective determination of the superiority of one technique versus another.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Facial Plast Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Facial Plast Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos