Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Extent of Equivalence of Results for Urine Albumin among 3 Candidate Mass Spectrometry Reference Measurement Procedures.
Miller, W Greg; Bachmann, Lorin M; Budd, Jeffrey; Beasley-Green, Ashley; Phinney, Karen W; Tan, Hwee Tong; Teo, Tang Lin; Liu, Qinde; Shiba, Seiei; Seegmiller, Jesse.
Afiliación
  • Miller WG; Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
  • Bachmann LM; Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
  • Budd J; Jeff Budd Consulting, St. Paul, MN, United States.
  • Beasley-Green A; Biomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, United States.
  • Phinney KW; Biomolecular Measurement Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, United States.
  • Tan HT; Chemical Metrology Division, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Teo TL; Chemical Metrology Division, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Liu Q; Chemical Metrology Division, Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, Singapore.
  • Shiba S; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
  • Seegmiller J; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Clin Chem ; 2024 Aug 29.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39206663
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Urine albumin (UA) is an important biomarker of chronic kidney disease. Current in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVD-MDs) for measuring UA are not standardized, and median results among IVD-MDs differ by approximately 45%. Since fixed decision values are used to interpret UA, higher-order reference measurement procedures (RMPs) are needed for metrological traceability. Three candidate liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry RMPs have been developed for UA.

METHODS:

Eight single-donation human urine samples were measured by 3 candidate RMPs. Results were compared using t-test and variance component analysis.

RESULTS:

The mean results for each urine sample from each RMP laboratory were not statistically different from the overall mean value by t-test. The median total CV including contributions from bias and imprecision among the 3 RMP laboratories was 6.23% using variance component analysis for each sample. The allowable bias to the RMP for an end-user IVD-MD was ≦9.0% or ≦3.0% based on the desirable or optimal total allowable error of 30% or 24%, respectively. A maximum allowable standard uncertainty for an RMP result was determined to be 4.3% or 3.3% for desirable or optimal performance, respectively. The standard uncertainties for all of the RMP laboratories meet the desirable and optimal standard uncertainty specifications.

CONCLUSION:

The candidate RMPs for UA in these 3 laboratories have suitable agreement of results and uncertainties for use as higher-order RMPs in the metrological traceability of end-user IVD-MDs for measuring UA.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chem Asunto de la revista: QUIMICA CLINICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Clin Chem Asunto de la revista: QUIMICA CLINICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos