Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Regret and Responsibility Resolved? Evaluating Ordóñez and Connolly's (2000) Conclusions.
Zeelenberg M; van Dijk WW; Manstead AS.
Afiliação
  • Zeelenberg M; Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Organ Behav Hum Decis Process ; 81(1): 143-154, 2000 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10631073
ABSTRACT
T. Connolly, L. D. Ordo;aan;atez, and R. Coughlan (1997, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 73-85) argued, on the basis of 5 experiments, that regret need not be related to a sense of responsibility for the regretted outcome. We (M. Zeelenberg, W. W. van Dijk, & A. S. R. Manstead, 1998, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 254-272) showed in 2 experiments that this conclusion was premature, because it was based on an indirect measure of regret (i.e., overall happiness with the decision outcome). When regret was directly measured, the predicted effects of responsibility were found. L. D. Ordo;aan;atez and T. Connolly (2000, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 132-142) replicated our findings in 2 experiments. Based on their findings they arrived at 4 conclusions. In this rejoinder we first discuss Ordóñez and Connolly's new studies and we then discuss the validity of their 4 conclusions. Copyright 2000 Academic Press.
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Organ Behav Hum Decis Process Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Organ Behav Hum Decis Process Ano de publicação: 2000 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda