The liability of medical directors for utilization review decisions.
J Health Law
; 35(1): 105-43, 2002.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-11974520
ABSTRACT
Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) have turned to numerous cost-containment measures to combat rising healthcare costs. One of the most common is the use of utilization review to ascertain whether a recommended mode of treatment is "medically necessary." When the medical director of an MCO determines that care recommended by a patient's treating physician is not medically necessary and not eligible for coverage (and, as a result, potentially unattainable due to cost), the stage is set for litigation. In such situations, medical directors may become potentially liable for disciplinary action by their state medical licensing board as well as lawsuits for malpractice or negligence. However, plaintiffs wishing to recover damages for improper determinations of this nature or state boards trying to discipline these physicians, face the hurdles of the preemptive force of ERISA, and state doctrines to the effect that corporations (and, derivatively, their medical directors) cannot practice medicine and therefore cannot be liable for malpractice. Conflicting decisions and opinions make it impossible at the present time to have a settled expectation regarding the potential liability of medical directors in this context, although the law appears to be moving toward the treatment of utilization review as medical decisionmaking; therefore, it appears likely that the activities of medical directors increasingly will face state oversight--including the imposition of common law liability in appropriate situations.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Revisão da Utilização de Seguros
/
Programas de Assistência Gerenciada
/
Revisão da Utilização de Recursos de Saúde
/
Responsabilidade Legal
/
Imperícia
/
Diretores Médicos
País/Região como assunto:
America do norte
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Health Law
Assunto da revista:
HOSPITAIS
/
JURISPRUDENCIA
/
SAUDE PUBLICA
Ano de publicação:
2002
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Estados Unidos