Professionals' attitudes towards sex between institutionalized patients.

ABSTRACT

Sexual activity among institutionalized patients has always been an issue of concern to institutions. Despite this fact, there has been little consensus about how patient sexuality should be dealt with. Nor have clinical insights with respect to patient sexuality been empirically tested. Given the diversity of beliefs and policies in this area, guidelines concerning sexual activity among hospitalized mental patients seem to be badly needed. We examined the following six factors that we thought might influence staff decisions (1) the competence of a patient to engage in sexual activity, (2) the degree of consent, (3) the nature of sexual activity (e.g., hugging vs. genital relations), (4) the location of sexual activity (e.g., in bedroom vs. on grounds), (5) the sex of the initiating patient (6) the sex of the other patients. We hypothesized that mental health professionals, both as members of the community at large and as professionals, would have conventional moral views (as defined by Kohlberg) towards sexual activity. Supporting this hypothesis, of the six factors listed above, only location of the sexual activity and form of the sexual activity affected judgements on sexual activity significantly. The professionals interviewed appeared to be most condemning of homosexual acts, and least condemning of hugging. Although we had hypothesized that profession norms of consent and competence would be significant factors, they were not. The core implication of our study is that mental health professionals need training on competence assessment and its use in decision making and must reexamine their own prejudices (e.g., homophobia) to clarify their decision making about institutional policies.