Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Heritability of BMD of femoral neck and lumbar spine: a multivariate twin study of Finnish men.
Videman, Tapio; Levälahti, Esko; Battié, Michele C; Simonen, Riitta; Vanninen, Esko; Kaprio, Jaakko.
Afiliação
  • Videman T; Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. tapio.videman@ualberta.ca
J Bone Miner Res ; 22(9): 1455-62, 2007 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17547536
ABSTRACT
UNLABELLED Of the 80% variation in BMD among male twins that is caused by genetics, part was explained by genetic influences on lifting strength and lean body mass/height. Lifting strength was significant in both the femoral and spine BMD and body weight only for lumbar BMD.

INTRODUCTION:

The dominant role of heritability in BMD has been shown in twin studies among women. However, the mechanisms of genetic influences are poorly understood. BMD is associated with lean body mass and muscle strength, which both have a genetic component, but the relative effects of muscle strength and lean body mass/height on the total genetic and environmental variations influencing BMD of men are unclear. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Measurements of BMD from a DXA scanner on a representative sample of 147 monozygotic and 153 dizygotic male twin pairs (age, 35-70 yr) were related to a variety of anthropometric and behavioral covariates and interview data. Data were analyzed with univariate modeling of genetic characteristics, bivariate modeling of covariates that were significant in univariate models, and multivariate modeling of the simultaneous effects of significant covariates from the bivariate models.

RESULTS:

Heritability influences were estimated to account for 75% of the variance in femoral BMD and 83% in lumbar BMD. Univariate and bivariate modeling showed that, of the factors studied, only lifting force and lean body mass/height had statistically significant influences. Of the total genetic variation in femoral BMD, lifting force explained 9%, and lean body mass/height 18%; the proportions for lumbar BMD were 9% and 11%, respectively. Of the total environmental variation, the correlation with isokinetic lifting force explained 9% for femoral BMD and 10% for lumbar BMD. The genetic correlations between lifting force and femoral and lumbar BMD were approximately 0.3, as were the environmental correlations of isokinetic lifting force and femoral and lumbar BMD and of lean body mass/height and femoral BMD. The environmental correlation of lean body mass/height and femoral BMD was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Lifting force had effects on both femoral and lumbar BMD. Body weight was important, but only for lumbar BMD. Muscle strength may have the best potential for modification among behavioral factors to increase both femoral and lumbar BMD.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Densidade Óssea / Cabeça do Fêmur / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Bone Miner Res Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Densidade Óssea / Cabeça do Fêmur / Vértebras Lombares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Bone Miner Res Assunto da revista: METABOLISMO / ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá