Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing on immediate and delayed tests.
Fazio, Lisa K; Agarwal, Pooja K; Marsh, Elizabeth J; Roediger, Henry L.
Afiliação
  • Fazio LK; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. lkf@duke.edu
Mem Cognit ; 38(4): 407-18, 2010 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20516221
ABSTRACT
Multiple-choice testing has both positive and negative consequences for performance on later tests. Prior testing increases the number of questions answered correctly on a later test but also increases the likelihood that questions will be answered with lures from the previous multiple-choice test (Roediger & Marsh, 2005). Prior research has shown that the positive effects of testing persist over a delay, but no one has examined the durability of the negative effects of testing. To address this, subjects took multiple-choice and cued recall tests (on subsets of questions) both immediately and a week after studying. Although delay reduced both the positive and negative testing effects, both still occurred after 1 week, especially if the multiple-choice test had also been delayed. These results are consistent with the argument that recollection underlies both the positive and negative testing effects.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retenção Psicológica / Comportamento de Escolha / Sinais (Psicologia) / Avaliação Educacional / Memória de Curto Prazo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mem Cognit Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Retenção Psicológica / Comportamento de Escolha / Sinais (Psicologia) / Avaliação Educacional / Memória de Curto Prazo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mem Cognit Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos