Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Routine ankle brachial pressure index measurement for peripheral artery disease diagnosis in internal medicine department: Comparison with the recommendations of the Haute Autorité de Santé. Prospective descriptive study about 106 patients]. / Mesure systématique des index de pression systolique à la cheville pour le dépistage de l'artériopathie oblitérante des membres inférieurs dans les services de médecine interne : comparaison aux recommandations de la Haute Autorité de santé. Étude prospective descriptive chez 106 patients.
Vinit, Julien; Bielefeld, Philip; Muller, Géraldine; Bonnotte, Bernard; Lorcerie, Bernard; Besancenot, Jean-François; Terriat, Béatrice.
Afiliação
  • Vinit J; CHU de Dijon, hôpital général, médecine interne et maladies systémiques, 21033 Dijon cedex, France. julien.vinit@chu-dijon.fr
Presse Med ; 40(4 Pt 1): e163-72, 2011 Apr.
Article em Fr | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21255964
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) makes it possible to diagnose peripheral artery disease (PAD) and identify patients with a vascular risk. Recently, the Haute Autorité de santé (HAS) issued guidelines. We wanted to determine the interest and impact of these guidelines when applied to patients hospitalised in an internal medicine department.

METHODS:

We systematically measured the ABPI in two internal medicine departments. We compared the results obtained with the screening criteria and the good practices recommended by the HAS.

RESULTS:

The screening criteria recommended by the HAS were already applied in 91% of our 97 patients. PAD was found in 37.1% of patients. In 83% of cases, the diagnosis was unknown (p = 0.02). The PAD was symptomatic in 83% of the known PAD cases, and 3.3% in newly-diagnosed cases (p < 0.001)). The sensitivity of the HAS screening criteria applied to our population was 100% but almost patients justifies ABPI screening. The specificity was 11.5%, the positive predictive value 40% and the negative predictive value 100%. The optimal treatment recommended was implemented in only 50% of patients with known arteriopathy and in 10% of newly-diagnose PAD (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION:

PAD prevalence is high in internal medicine department and systematic measurement of ABPI is effective. Determining patients to screen with the HAS criteria has a poor impact in our patients. The optimal treatment is still extremely under-prescribed even in patients with known PAD.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arteriopatias Oclusivas / Programas de Rastreamento / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Índice Tornozelo-Braço / Isquemia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged80 País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Presse Med Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Arteriopatias Oclusivas / Programas de Rastreamento / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Índice Tornozelo-Braço / Isquemia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Aged80 País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: Fr Revista: Presse Med Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França