Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Passive leg raising predicts volume responsiveness in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock].
Huang, Lei; Zhang, Wei-xing; Cai, Wen-xun; Zhu, Zhong-sheng; Zhang, Chi; Jiang, Chun-ling.
Afiliação
  • Huang L; Intensive Care Unit, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China.
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue ; 23(3): 154-7, 2011 Mar.
Article em Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21366944
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the role of passive leg raising (PLR) test in predicting volume responsiveness in severe sepsis and septic shock patients.

METHODS:

Thirty severe sepsis and septic shock patients in intensive care unit (ICU) of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital were prospectively observed from February 2009 to January 2010. The hemodynamics including stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured non invasively by ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) device in the supine position, during PLR and after volume expansion (VE), and invasive arterial blood pressure and central venous pressure (CVP) were monitored consecutively. Responders were defined by the appearance of an increase in SV (ΔSV) ≥ 15% after VE. The role of PLR for predicting volume responsiveness was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS:

The CVP (cm H(2)O, 1 cm H(2)O=0.098 kPa) during PLR was increased compared with that at supine position in both responder group ( n =15) and non responder group ( n =15, 13.6 ± 6.6 vs. 12.1 ± 6.0, 11.9 ± 5.5 vs. 10.8 ± 5.2 , both P <0.01). ΔSV was higher in responder group than in non responder group during PLR [(16.6 ± 5.5)% vs. (3.8 ± 8.2)%, P=0.000].ΔSV during PLR was highly correlated to ΔSV after VE (r =0.681 , P =0.000).The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for PLR predicting volume responsiveness was 0.944 ± 0.039 ( P =0.000). The ΔSV>11% during PLR was found to predict volume responsiveness with a sensitivity of 86.7%, specificity of 93.3%, positive predictive value of 92.9% and negative predictive value of 87.5%.

CONCLUSION:

PLR can be used generally to predict volume responsiveness accurately in severe sepsis and septic shock patients, and it can be used to direct clinical practice.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Séptico / Sepse / Teste de Esforço Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Choque Séptico / Sepse / Teste de Esforço Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: Zh Revista: Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA / TERAPIA INTENSIVA Ano de publicação: 2011 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China