[Early clinical outcomes of fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
; 91(11): 752-6, 2011 Mar 22.
Article
em Zh
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-21600100
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the early clinical outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty by a fixed-bearing versus mobile-bearing prosthesis.METHODS:
A total of 80 patients with osteoarthritis at our hospital from January 2008 to October 2008 were sequentially and randomly assigned into Group A (fixed-bearing prosthesis) (40 knees) and Group B (mobile-bearing prosthesis) (40 knees). And the data of the range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario MacMaster (WOMAC) were collected at pre-operation and 6, 12 and 24 months post-operation respectively.RESULTS:
The P values were as follows KSS 0.754, 0.802, 0.561, 0.764; HSS (Hospital for Special Surgery) 0.737, 0.361, 0.254, 0.330; WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) osteoarthritis index 0.976, 0.557, 0.946, 0.818; ROM follow-up 0.519, 0.646, 0.175, 0.276. No significant differences were found in clinical outcomes between two groups.CONCLUSION:
The fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses show no difference in clinical outcomes.
Buscar no Google
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Osteoartrite
/
Artroplastia do Joelho
/
Prótese do Joelho
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
/
Observational_studies
Limite:
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
Ano de publicação:
2011
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
China