Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An institution-specific analysis of ACL reconstruction failure.
Frank, Rachel M; McGill, Kevin C; Cole, Brian J; Bush-Joseph, Charles A; Bach, Bernard R; Verma, Nikhil N; Slabaugh, Mark A.
Afiliação
  • Frank RM; Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
J Knee Surg ; 25(2): 143-9, 2012 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22928431
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to determine the most common causes of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using modern reconstructive techniques at a single, high-volume institution. In addition, the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACLR will be reported. The surgical logs of four senior knee surgeons were retrospectively reviewed for all patients who had undergone ACLR between 2002 and 2009. Patients were excluded if they did not have both the primary and revision surgery on the same knee with the same surgeon. Out of 1944 ACL reconstructions, 28 patients (56 reconstructions) were included in the study. Radiographic studies, operative reports, KT-1000 scores, and chart notes were used to identify all potential factors that may have led to failure. All patients were invited to return for a follow-up examination and survey. Of the 28 patients, the mean age at the index and revision procedure was 22 +/- 11 (range, 12 to 50) and 24 +/- 11 (range, 14 to 57), respectively. In 20 cases, the cause of failure was determined to be acute trauma (sports, work, or accident); in 1 case, the cause was biologic failure; while in 7 cases, the cause was technical error. During the study period the surgeons performed a combined total of 1944 procedures, for an overall failure rate of 1.8%. Twenty patients (71%) were available for follow-up at a mean 30.2 +/- 17.7 months. The overall postrevision outcomes were good to excellent for a majority of patients, with an average Lysholm score of 84 +/- 15.5 and International Knee Documentation Committee score of 77.2 +/- 13.8. The pre- and postoperative KT-1000 scores were 12.1 +/- 2.8 and 6.7 +/- 2.8, respectively. The results from this study suggest that traumatic re-injury, and not surgical/surgeon error, is the most common cause of ACLR failure using anatomic reconstructive principles and strong fixation. In addition, good to excellent outcomes following revision ACLR can be expected in the majority of patients.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Knee Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Reconstrução do Ligamento Cruzado Anterior Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Knee Surg Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2012 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos