Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of clinically estimated fetal weight in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus and obesity.
Drassinower, Daphnie; Timofeev, Julia; Huang, Chun-Chih; Benson, James E; Driggers, Rita W; Landy, Helain J.
Afiliação
  • Drassinower D; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Timofeev J; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington Hospital Center, MedStar Health, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Huang CC; Biostatistics and Epidemiology, MedStar Health Research Institute, Hyattsville, Maryland.
  • Benson JE; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Driggers RW; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington Hospital Center, MedStar Health, Washington, District of Columbia.
  • Landy HJ; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgetown University Hospital, MedStar Health, Washington, District of Columbia.
Am J Perinatol ; 31(1): 31-7, 2014 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23456900
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of clinically estimated fetal weight (CEFW) in patients with gestational diabetes (GDM), pregestational diabetes (DM), and obesity. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of Consortium of Safe Labor data. Subjects were classified into six groups: DM, DM and obese, GDM, GDM and obese, nondiabetic obese, and controls. The mean difference between birth weight (BW) and CEFW, the percent of accurate CEFW (defined as < 10% difference), and the sensitivity for identifying BW > 4,000 g and > 4,500 g were calculated for each group. RESULTS: The accuracy of CEFW in our population was 54.3 to 64.4% and was significantly lower in patients with DM and obesity and patients with obesity but not diabetes. When CEFW was analyzed in the >4,000-g and > 4,500-g groups, its accuracy was 20 to 51% and 14 to 40%, respectively. CEFW overestimated BW more commonly in GDM, obese GDM, and obese groups. The sensitivity of CEFW for diagnosing BW > 4,000 g or > 4,500 g was 19.6% and 9.6%, respectively, and it improved in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. CONCLUSION: CEFW is a poor predictor of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by obesity and diabetes.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gravidez em Diabéticas / Macrossomia Fetal / Diabetes Gestacional / Peso Fetal / Complicações do Diabetes / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Am J Perinatol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gravidez em Diabéticas / Macrossomia Fetal / Diabetes Gestacional / Peso Fetal / Complicações do Diabetes / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Am J Perinatol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article