Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Heliox therapy in bronchiolitis: phase III multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Chowdhury, Mina M; McKenzie, Sheila A; Pearson, Christopher C; Carr, Siobhan; Pao, Caroline; Shah, Arvind R; Reus, Elizabeth; Eliahoo, Joseph; Gordon, Fabiana; Bland, Hubert; Habibi, Parviz.
Afiliação
  • Chowdhury MM; Department of Pediatrics, Wright Fleming Institute, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Pediatrics ; 131(4): 661-9, 2013 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23509160
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Supportive care remains the mainstay of therapy in bronchiolitis. Earlier studies suggest that helium-oxygen therapy may be beneficial, but evidence is limited. We aimed to compare efficacy of 2 treatment gases, Heliox and Airox (21% oxygen + 79% helium or nitrogen, respectively), on length of hospital treatment for bronchiolitis.

METHODS:

This was a multicenter randomized blinded controlled trial of 319 bronchiolitic infant subjects randomly assigned to either gas; 281 subjects completed the study (140 Heliox, 141 Airox), whose data was analyzed. Treatment was delivered via facemask (nasal cannula, if the facemask intolerant) ± continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Severe bronchiolitics received CPAP from the start. Primary end point was length of treatment (LoT) required to alleviate hypoxia and respiratory distress. Secondary end-points were proportion of subjects needing CPAP; CPAP (LoT); and change in respiratory distress score.

RESULTS:

Analysis by intention to treat (all subjects); median LoT (inter-quartile range, days) Heliox 1.90 (1.08-3.17), Airox 1.87 (1.11-3.34), P = .41. Facemask tolerant subgroup Heliox 1.46 (0.85-1.95), Airox 2.01 (0.93-2.86), P = .03. Nasal cannula subgroup Heliox 2.51 (1.21-4.32), Airox 2.81 (1.45-4.78), P = .53. Subgroup started on CPAP Heliox 1.55 (1.38-2.01), Airox 2.26 (1.84-2.73), P = .02. Proportion of subjects needing CPAP Heliox 17%, Airox 19%, O.R. 0.87 (0.47-1.60), P = .76. Heliox reduced respiratory distress score after 8 hours (mixed models estimate, -0.1298; P < .001). The effect was greater for facemask compared with nasal cannula (mixed models estimate, 0.093; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS:

Heliox therapy does not reduce LoT unless given via a tight-fitting facemask or CPAP. Nasal cannula heliox therapy is ineffective.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxigênio / Terapia Respiratória / Bronquiolite / Hélio / Nitrogênio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatrics Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Oxigênio / Terapia Respiratória / Bronquiolite / Hélio / Nitrogênio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: Pediatrics Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido