Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevention and management of potential adverse events during transapical aortic valve replacement.
von Segesser, Ludwig K; Gerosa, Gino; Borger, Michael A; Ferrari, Enrico.
Afiliação
  • von Segesser LK; Cardiovascular Surgery Unit, University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Heart Valve Dis ; 22(3): 276-86, 2013 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24151752
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY Transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a new minimally invasive technique with a known risk of unexpected intra-procedural complications. Nevertheless, the clinical results are good and the limited amount of procedural adverse events confirms the usefulness of a synergistic surgical/anesthesiological management in case of unexpected emergencies.

METHODS:

A review was made of the authors' four-year database and other available literature to identify major and minor intra-procedural complications occurring during transapical TAVR procedures. All implants were performed under general anesthesia with a balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien stent-valve, and followed international guidelines on indications and techniques.

RESULTS:

Procedural success rates ranged between 94% and 100%. Life-threatening apical bleeding occurred very rarely (0-5%), and its incidence decreased after the first series of implants. Stent-valve embolization was also rare, with a global incidence ranging from 0-2%, with evidence of improvement after the learning curve. Rates of valve malpositioning ranged from 0% to < 3%, whereas the risk of coronary obstruction ranged from 0% to 3.5%. Aortic root rupture and dissection were dramatic events reported in 0-2% of transapical cases. Stent-valve malfunction was rarely reported (1-2%), whereas the valve-in-valve bailout procedure for malpositioning, malfunctioning or severe paravalvular leak was reported in about 1.0-3.5% of cases. Sudden hemodynamic management and bailout procedures such as valve-in-valve rescue or cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass were more effective when planned during the preoperative phase.

CONCLUSION:

Despite attempts to avoid pitfalls, complications during transapical aortic valve procedures still occur. Preoperative strategic planning, including hemodynamic status management, alternative cannulation sites and bailout procedures, are highly recommended, particularly during the learning curve of this technique.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Stents / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Complicações Intraoperatórias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Heart Valve Dis Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Valva Aórtica / Estenose da Valva Aórtica / Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas / Stents / Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca / Complicações Intraoperatórias Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: J Heart Valve Dis Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suíça