Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characteristics and long-term follow-up of participants with peripheral arterial disease during ALLHAT.
Piller, Linda B; Simpson, Lara M; Baraniuk, Sarah; Habib, Gabriel B; Rahman, Mahboob; Basile, Jan N; Dart, Richard A; Ellsworth, Allan J; Fendley, Herbert; Probstfield, Jeffrey L; Whelton, Paul K; Davis, Barry R.
Afiliação
  • Piller LB; The University of Texas School of Public Health, 1200 Herman Pressler St., W-906, Houston, TX, 77030, USA, Linda.b.piller@uth.tmc.edu.
J Gen Intern Med ; 29(11): 1475-83, 2014 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25002161
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Hypertension is a major risk factor for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Little is known about relative efficacy of antihypertensive treatments for preventing PAD.

OBJECTIVES:

To compare, by randomized treatment groups, hospitalized or revascularized PAD rates and subsequent morbidity and mortality among participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lower Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

DESIGN:

Randomized, double-blind, active-control trial in high-risk hypertensive participants.

PARTICIPANTS:

Eight hundred thirty participants with specified secondary outcome of lower extremity PAD events during the randomized phase of ALLHAT. INTERVENTIONS/EVENTS In-trial PAD events were reported during ALLHAT (1994-2002). Post-trial mortality data through 2006 were obtained from administrative databases. Mean follow-up was 8.8 years. MAIN

MEASURES:

Baseline characteristics and intermediate outcomes in three treatment groups, using the Kaplan-Meier method to calculate cumulative event rates and post-PAD mortality rates, Cox proportional hazards regression model for hazard ratios and 95 % confidence intervals, and multivariate Cox regression models to examine risk differences among treatment groups. KEY

RESULTS:

Following adjustment for baseline characteristics, neither participants assigned to the calcium-channel antagonist amlodipine nor to the ACE-inhibitor lisinopril showed a difference in risk of clinically advanced PAD compared with those in the chlorthalidone arm (HR, 0.86; 95 % CI, 0.72-1.03 and HR, 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.83-1.17, respectively). Of the 830 participants with in-trial PAD events, 63 % died compared to 34 % of those without PAD; there were no significant treatment group differences for subsequent nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularizations, strokes, heart failure, or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:

Neither amlodipine nor lisinopril showed superiority over chlorthalidone in reducing clinically advanced PAD risk. These findings reinforce the compelling need for comparative outcome trials examining treatment of PAD in high-risk hypertensive patients. Once PAD develops, cardiovascular event and mortality risk is high, regardless of type of antihypertensive treatment.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Arterial Periférica / Hipertensão / Anti-Hipertensivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença Arterial Periférica / Hipertensão / Anti-Hipertensivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Gen Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article