Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lack of any association of GST genetic polymorphisms with susceptibility to ovarian cancer--a meta-analysis.
Han, Li-Yuan; Liu, Kui; Lin, Xia-Lu; Zou, Bao-Bo; Zhao, Jin-Shun.
Afiliação
  • Han LY; Department of Preventive Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathological and Physiological Technology, Medical School of Ningbo University, Ningbo, China E-mail : zhaojinshun@nbu.edu.cn.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 15(15): 6131-6, 2014.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25124586
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Epidemiology studies have reported conflicting results between glutathione S-transferase Mu-1 (GSTM1), glutathione S-transferase theta-1 (GSTT1) and glutathione S-transferase pi-1 (GSTP1) and ovarian cancer (OC) susceptibility. In this study, an updated meta-analysis was applied to determine whether the deletion of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 has an influence on OC susceptibility.

METHODS:

A published literature search was performed through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Science Citation Index Expanded database for articles published in English. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated using random or fixed effects models. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics. Sub-group analysis was conducted to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis was employed to evaluate the respective influence of each study on the overall estimate.

RESULTS:

In total, 10 published studies were included in the final analysis. The combined analysis revealed that there was no significant association between GSTM1 null genotype and OC risk (OR=1.01, 95%CI 0.91-1.12). Additionally, there was no significant association between GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms and OC risk (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.13). Similalry, no significant associations were found concerning the GSTP1 rs1695 locus and OC risk. Meanwhile, subgroup analysis did not show a significant increase in eligible studies with low heterogeneity. However, sensitivity analysis, publication bias and cumulative analysis demonstrated the reliability and stability of the current meta-analysis.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings suggest that GSTs genetic polymorphisms may not contribute to OC susceptibility. Large epidemiological studies with the combination of GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null and GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphisms and more specific histological subtypes of OC are needed to prove our findings.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Polimorfismo Genético / Predisposição Genética para Doença / Glutationa S-Transferase pi / Glutationa Transferase Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Polimorfismo Genético / Predisposição Genética para Doença / Glutationa S-Transferase pi / Glutationa Transferase Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article