Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antirelapse Efficacy of Various Primaquine Regimens for Plasmodium vivax.
Rajgor, D D; Gogtay, N J; Kadam, V S; Kocharekar, M M; Parulekar, M S; Dalvi, S S; Vaidya, A B; Kshirsagar, N A.
Afiliação
  • Rajgor DD; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India.
  • Gogtay NJ; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India.
  • Kadam VS; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India.
  • Kocharekar MM; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India.
  • Parulekar MS; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India.
  • Dalvi SS; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Seth G.S. Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India.
  • Vaidya AB; Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Molecular Parasitology, Drexel University College of Medicine (DUCM), Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
  • Kshirsagar NA; National Chair Clinical Pharmacology, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Government of India, New Delhi 110 002, India ; Employee's State Insurance-Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences & Research (ESI-PGIMSR), Government of India, Mahatma Gandhi Memorial (MGM) Hospital, Dr. S.S. R
Malar Res Treat ; 2014: 347018, 2014.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25295216
ABSTRACT
Background. Efficacy of standard dose of primaquine (PQ) as antirelapse for P. vivax has decreased. We aimed to assess efficacy of different PQ regimens. Methods. It was an open label, randomized, controlled, parallel group, assessor blind study comparing antirelapse efficacy of 3 PQ regimens (B = 15 mg/day × 14 days, C = 30 mg/day × 7 days, and D = 30 mg/day × 14 days) with no PQ group (A) in P. vivax patients. Paired primary and recurrence samples were subjected to 3

methods:

(i) month of recurrence and genotyping, (ii) by PCR-RFLP, and (iii) PCR sequencing, to differentiate relapse and reinfection. The rates of recurrence relapse and reinfection were compared. Methods were compared for concordance between them. Results. The recurrence rate was 16.39%, 8.07%, 10.07%, and 6.62% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (P = 0.004). The relapse rate was 6.89%, 1.55%, 4%, and 3.85% as per the month of recurrence; 8.2%, 2%, 4.58%, and 3.68% (P = 0.007) as per PCR-RFLP; and 2.73%, 1.47%, 1.55%, and 1.53% as per PCR sequencing for groups A, B, C, and D, respectively. The concordance between methods was low, 45%. Conclusion. The higher recurrence rate in no PQ as compared to PQ groups documents PQ antirelapse activity. Regimens tested were safe. However, probable resistance to PQ warrants continuous monitoring and low concordance and limitations in the methods warrant caution in interpreting.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Malar Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Malar Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Índia