Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Are there differences between macrocyclic gadolinium contrast agents for brain tumor imaging? Results of a multicenter intraindividual crossover comparison of gadobutrol with gadoteridol (the TRUTH study).
Maravilla, K R; Smith, M P; Vymazal, J; Goyal, M; Herman, M; Baima, J J; Babbel, R; Vaneckova, M; Zizka, J; Colosimo, C; Urbanczyk-Zawadzka, M; Mechl, M; Bag, A K; Bastianello, S; Bueltmann, E; Hirai, T; Frattini, T; Kirchin, M A; Pirovano, G.
Afiliação
  • Maravilla KR; From the MR Research Laboratory (K.R.M.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington kmarav@uw.edu.
  • Smith MP; Department of Radiology (M.P.S.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Vymazal J; Department of Radiology (J.V.), Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Goyal M; Seaman Family MR Research Centre (M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
  • Herman M; Department of Radiology (M.H.), University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
  • Baima JJ; Clinical Radiologists Service Corporation (J.J.B.), Memorial Medical Center, Springfield, Illinois.
  • Babbel R; Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center (R.B.), Corvallis, Oregon.
  • Vaneckova M; Department of Magnetic Resonance (M.V.), General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Zizka J; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (J.Z.), University Hospital Hradec Králové and Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Colosimo C; Istituto di Radiologia (C.C.), Policlinico "Agostino Gemelli," Rome, Italy.
  • Urbanczyk-Zawadzka M; Department of Radiology (M.U.-Z.), John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
  • Mechl M; Department of Radiology (M.M.), University Hospital Brno-Bohunice, Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Bag AK; Department of Radiology (A.K.B.), University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Bastianello S; Department of Neuroradiology (S.B), University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
  • Bueltmann E; Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (E.B.), Hannover, Germany.
  • Hirai T; Department of Diagnostic Radiology (T.H.), Kumamoto University, Honjo, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Frattini T; Ospedale Valduce (T.F.), Como, Italy.
  • Kirchin MA; Global Medical and Regulatory Affairs (M.A.K.), Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy.
  • Pirovano G; Global Medical and Regulatory Affairs (G.P.), Bracco Diagnostics, Monroe, New Jersey.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 36(1): 14-23, 2015 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25300984
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Gadobutrol (Gadavist) and gadoteridol (ProHance) have similar macrocyclic molecular structures, but gadobutrol is formulated at a 2-fold higher (1 mol/L versus 0.5 mol/L) concentration. We sought to determine whether this difference impacts morphologic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Two hundred twenty-nine adult patients with suspected or known brain tumors underwent two 1.5T MR imaging examinations with gadoteridol or gadobutrol administered in randomized order at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight. Imaging sequences and T1 postinjection timing were identical for both examinations. Three blinded readers evaluated images qualitatively and quantitatively for lesion detection and for accuracy in characterization of histologically confirmed brain tumors. Data were analyzed by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, the McNemar test, and a mixed model.

RESULTS:

Two hundred nine patients successfully completed both examinations. No reader noted a significant qualitative or quantitative difference in lesion enhancement, extent, delineation, or internal morphology (P values = .69-1.00). One hundred thirty-nine patients had at least 1 histologically confirmed brain lesion. Two readers found no difference in the detection of patients with lesions (133/139 versus 135/139, P = .317; 137/139 versus 136/139, P = .564), while 1 reader found minimal differences in favor of gadoteridol (136/139 versus 132/139, P = .046). Similar findings were noted for the number of lesions detected and characterization of tumors (malignant/benign). Three-reader agreement for characterization was similar for gadobutrol (66.4% [κ = 0.43]) versus gadoteridol (70.3% [κ = 0.45]). There were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events (P = .199).

CONCLUSIONS:

Gadoteridol and gadobutrol at 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight provide similar information for visualization and diagnosis of brain lesions. The 2-fold higher gadolinium concentration of gadobutrol provides no benefit for routine morphologic imaging.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos Organometálicos / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Meios de Contraste / Compostos Heterocíclicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos Organometálicos / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Meios de Contraste / Compostos Heterocíclicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article