Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of MRI-TRUS fusion versus cognitive registration accuracy for MRI-targeted, TRUS-guided prostate biopsy.
Cool, Derek W; Zhang, Xuli; Romagnoli, Cesare; Izawa, Jonathan I; Romano, Walter M; Fenster, Aaron.
Afiliação
  • Cool DW; 1 Department of Medical Imaging, Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 204(1): 83-91, 2015 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25539241
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this article is to compare transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy accuracies of operators with different levels of prostate MRI experience using cognitive registration versus MRI-TRUS fusion to assess the preferred method of TRUS prostate biopsy for MRI-identified lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS; One hundred patients from a prospective prostate MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy study were reviewed to identify all patients with clinically significant prostate adenocarcinoma (PCA) detected on MRI-targeted biopsy. Twenty-five PCA tumors were incorporated into a validated TRUS prostate biopsy simulator. Three prostate biopsy experts, each with different levels of experience in prostate MRI and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy, performed a total of 225 simulated targeted biopsies on the MRI lesions as well as regional biopsy targets. Simulated biopsies performed using cognitive registration with 2D TRUS and 3D TRUS were compared with biopsies performed under MRI-TRUS fusion.

RESULTS:

Two-dimensional and 3D TRUS sampled only 48% and 45% of clinically significant PCA MRI lesions, respectively, compared with 100% with MRI-TRUS fusion. Lesion sampling accuracy did not statistically significantly vary according to operator experience or tumor volume. MRI-TRUS fusion-naïve operators showed consistent errors in targeting of the apex, midgland, and anterior targets, suggesting that there is biased error in cognitive registration. The MRI-TRUS fusion expert correctly targeted the prostate apex; however, his midgland and anterior mistargeting was similar to that of the less-experienced operators.

CONCLUSION:

MRI-targeted TRUS-guided prostate biopsy using cognitive registration appears to be inferior to MRI-TRUS fusion, with fewer than 50% of clinically significant PCA lesions successfully sampled. No statistically significant difference in biopsy accuracy was seen according to operator experience with prostate MRI or MRI-TRUS fusion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Técnica de Subtração / Competência Clínica / Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Técnica de Subtração / Competência Clínica / Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista / Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá