Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Do traditional risk stratification models for cerebrovascular events apply in irradiated head and neck cancer patients?
Gujral, D M; Shah, B N; Chahal, N S; Bhattacharyya, S; Senior, R; Harrington, K J; Nutting, C M.
Afiliação
  • Gujral DM; From the Head and Neck Unit, Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK and chris.nutting@rmh.nhs.uk.
  • Shah BN; Department of Echocardiography, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.
  • Chahal NS; Department of Echocardiography, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.
  • Bhattacharyya S; Department of Echocardiography, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.
  • Senior R; Department of Echocardiography, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK.
  • Harrington KJ; From the Head and Neck Unit, Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK and.
  • Nutting CM; From the Head and Neck Unit, Department of Radiotherapy, The Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK and.
QJM ; 109(6): 383-9, 2016 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26109594
BACKGROUND: Primary radical radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) often results in significant radiation dose to the carotid arteries. AIM: We assessed whether HNC patients are at increased risk of a cerebrovascular event primarily due to RT or other risk factors for atherosclerosis by (i) risk-stratifying patients according to validated QRISK-2 and QSTROKE scores and (ii) comparing the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in irradiated and unirradiated carotid arteries. DESIGN: HNC patients treated with an RT dose >50 Gy to one side of the neck ≥2 years previously were included. METHODS: QRISK-2 (2014) and Q-STROKE (2014) scores were calculated. We compared the prevalence of CAS in segments of the common carotid artery on the irradiated and unirradiated sides of the neck. RESULTS: Fifty patients (median age of 58 years (interquartile range (IQR) 50-62)) were included. The median QRISK-2 score was 10% (IQR 4.4-15%) and the median QSTROKE score was 3.4% (IQR 1.4-5.3%). For both scores, no patient was classified as high risk. Thirty-eight patients (76%) had CAS in one or both arteries. There was a significant difference in the number of irradiated arteries with stenosis (N = 37) compared with unirradiated arteries (N = 16) (P < 0.0001). There were more plaques on the irradiated artery compared with the unirradiated side - 64/87 (73.6%) versus 23/87 (26.4%), respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Traditional vascular risk factors do not play a role in radiation-induced carotid atherosclerosis. Clinicians should be aware that traditional risk prediction models may under-estimate stroke risk in these patients.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões por Radiação / Artérias Carótidas / Doenças das Artérias Carótidas / Ultrassonografia / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: QJM Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões por Radiação / Artérias Carótidas / Doenças das Artérias Carótidas / Ultrassonografia / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: QJM Assunto da revista: MEDICINA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article