Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acute toxicity after a diverting stoma and spacer prior to chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer.
van der Voort van Zyp, Jochem R N; Ceha, Heleen M; Niehe, Valerie; Marinelli, Andreas W K S; Putter, Hein; Marijnen, Corrie A M.
Afiliação
  • van der Voort van Zyp JR; Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
  • Ceha HM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy Center West, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Niehe V; Department of Radiology, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Marinelli AW; Department of Surgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  • Putter H; Department of Biomedical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
  • Marijnen CA; Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands. Electronic address: c.a.m.marijnen@lumc.nl.
Radiother Oncol ; 116(1): 107-11, 2015 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26187017
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

PURPOSE:

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). For grade ⩾3 acute diarrhea there is a relationship between dose and irradiated small bowel volume. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether combined placement of a diverting stoma and sigmoid spacer (DSSS) led to reduced irradiated small bowel volume and less grade ⩾3 acute diarrhea in the treatment of LARC. MATERIALS/

METHODS:

Between 2003 and 2010, 54 of 189 LARC patients treated with CRT in two institutions had a DSSS prior to CRT. Data on patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes were collected retrospectively. Delineation of small bowel was performed with planning CT-scans. CTCAE version 4.0 was used for acute toxicity.

RESULTS:

Patients with a DSSS had significantly less small bowel volume irradiated up to doses of 20Gy. This difference was not observed for the higher dose levels. CRT induced grade ⩾3 acute diarrhea was not different between the two groups (8.3% vs. 12.8%; p=0.41).

CONCLUSION:

DSSS is not clearly beneficial to reduce grade ⩾3 acute diarrhea, and it must be considered whether placement of a DSSS is justified for this purpose.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Quimiorradioterapia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Radiother Oncol Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda