Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Airways resistance and specific conductance for the diagnosis of obstructive airways diseases.
Topalovic, Marko; Derom, Eric; Osadnik, Christian R; Troosters, Thierry; Decramer, Marc; Janssens, Wim.
Afiliação
  • Topalovic M; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, University Hospital Leuven, KULEUVEN University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Derom E; Respiratory Division, University Hospital Ghent, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Osadnik CR; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Troosters T; Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Decramer M; Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Victoria, Australia.
  • Janssens W; Monash Health, Monash Lung and Sleep, Victoria, Australia.
Respir Res ; 16: 88, 2015 Jul 22.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26194099
BACKGROUND: Airway resistance (RAW) and specific airway conductance (sGAW) are measures that reflect the patency of airways. Little is known of the variability of these measures between different lung diseases. This study investigated the contribution of RAW and sGAW to a diagnosis of obstructive airways disease and their role in differentiating asthma from COPD. METHODS: 976 subjects admitted for the first time to a pulmonary practice in Belgium were included. Clinical diagnoses were based on complete pulmonary function tests and supported by investigations of physicians' discretion. 651 subjects had a final diagnosis of obstructive diseases, 168 had another respiratory disease and 157 subjects had no respiratory disease (healthy controls). RESULTS: RAW and sGAW were significantly different (p < 0.0001) between obstructive and other groups. Abnormal RAW and sGAW were found in 39 % and 18 % of the population, respectively, in which 81 % and 90 % had diagnosed airway obstruction. Multiple regression revealed sGAW to be a significant and independent predictor of an obstructive disorder. To differentiate asthma from COPD, RAW was found to be more relevant and statistically significant. In asthma patients with normal FEV1/FVC ratio, both RAW and sGAW were more specific than sensitive diagnostic tests in differentiating asthma from healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: RAW and sGAW are significant factors that contribute to the diagnosis and differentiation of obstructive airways diseases.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resistência das Vias Respiratórias / Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Resistência das Vias Respiratórias / Obstrução das Vias Respiratórias Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Respir Res Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica