Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis For Esophagectomy: A Survey of Practice Patterns Among Thoracic Surgeons.
Zwischenberger, Brittany A; Tzeng, Ching-Wei D; Ward, Nicholas D; Zwischenberger, Joseph B; Martin, Jeremiah T.
Afiliação
  • Zwischenberger BA; Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Tzeng CW; Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Ward ND; Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Zwischenberger JB; Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Martin JT; Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. Electronic address: j.martin@uky.edu.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 101(2): 489-94, 2016 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26409709
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Current guidelines for gastrointestinal cancer surgical intervention in high-risk patients recommend postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemical prophylaxis for 4 weeks with low-dose unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin, but specific guidelines for esophagectomy are lacking. This survey identified the clinical patterns affecting postesophagectomy VTE chemoprophylaxis use among general thoracic surgeons.

METHODS:

General Thoracic Surgery Club members were invited to complete an online survey on VTE prophylaxis to analyze clinical factors affecting their choices.

RESULTS:

Seventy-seven surgeons (37% membership) responded; of these, 94% (72 of 77) completed fellowships, and 76% (58 of 77) worked at universities. VTE chemoprophylaxis administration varied widely in drug, dosing, and duration, with 30% using suboptimal dosing of unfractionated heparin (every 12 hours). Participants agreed that esophagectomy patients are at high VTE risk, yet 29% (22 of 76) of surgeons delay VTE chemoprophylaxis until postoperative day 1. Only 13% (10 of 77) prescribe postdischarge chemoprophylaxis. Minimally invasive surgeons (>90% of cases) were more likely to prescribe postdischarge prophylaxis (p = 0.007). Epidurals, routinely used by 65% (51 of 78), led to less compliance with recommended dosing. Only 53% (27 of 51) of pain teams allow unfractionated heparin every 8 hours, yet 73% (37 of 51) allow suboptimal dosing (every 12 h). Postoperative major complications were identified as a VTE risk factor by only 21% (15 of 72) of surgeons. Most (92% [68 of 74]) would follow esophagectomy-specific guidelines, if developed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Thoracic surgeons agree that VTE chemoprophylaxis is necessary for esophagectomy, yet substantial variability exists in current practice. A noteworthy proportion use suboptimal dosing, and very few choose postdischarge prophylaxis. To improve postesophagectomy morbidity and mortality outcomes, thoracic surgeons are willing to follow evidence-based guidelines for VTE chemoprophylaxis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Cirurgia Torácica / Padrões de Prática Médica / Heparina / Esofagectomia / Tromboembolia Venosa / Anticoagulantes Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Thorac Surg Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Cirurgia Torácica / Padrões de Prática Médica / Heparina / Esofagectomia / Tromboembolia Venosa / Anticoagulantes Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Thorac Surg Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article