Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and Tolerability of Peginterferon alpha-2a and Peginterferon alpha-2b in Iranian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C.
Pouresmaeeli, Mahdiyar; Alavian, Seyed Moayed; Keshvari, Maryam; Salimi, Shima; Mehrnoush, Leila.
Afiliação
  • Pouresmaeeli M; Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tehran, IR Iran ; Middle East Liver Diseases Center (MELD), Tehran, IR Iran.
  • Alavian SM; Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tehran, IR Iran ; Middle East Liver Diseases Center (MELD), Tehran, IR Iran.
  • Keshvari M; Blood Transfusion Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, IR Iran.
  • Salimi S; Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tehran, IR Iran ; Middle East Liver Diseases Center (MELD), Tehran, IR Iran.
  • Mehrnoush L; Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Tehran, IR Iran ; Middle East Liver Diseases Center (MELD), Tehran, IR Iran.
Hepat Mon ; 15(9): e30780, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26504470
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Nearly 0.5% of Iranians are infected with HCV. Peginterferon-alpha-2a and Peginterferon-alpha-2b are the two available types of interferon for the treatment of hepatitis C. Comparing the results of these two treatments is still a challenge.

OBJECTIVES:

The aim of this study was to compare the results of Peginterferon-alpha-2a and Peginterferon-alpha-2b in Iranian patients with chronic hepatitis C. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

289 patients with chronic hepatitis C attending Tehran Hepatitis Center (THC) and Hepatitis Clinic of Tehran Blood Transfusion Organization (TBTO) from January 2008 to April 2013 and treated with combination of Peginterferon-alpha-2a or Peginterferon-alpha-2b plus Ribavirin were enrolled in this retrospective cross-sectional study. Treatment response and side effects were compared.

RESULTS:

Among all naive patients, 82.0% achieved SVR, 5.4% were resistant to therapy and 11.0% withdrew the treatment. Relapse was seen in 12.2% of naive patients who finished the course of treatment. RVR and EVR were seen in 67.7% and 90.6% of naive patients, respectively. Patients divided into two groups. Group A consists of 247 patients treated with Peginterferon-alpha-2a and group B 42 patients treated with Peginterferon-alpha-2b. No significant difference in treatment response was observed between naive patients of the two groups. The rates of arthralgia/myalgia, alopecia, pruritus, insomnia, dyspnea and anorexia were higher in group A and the rates of dermal problems, coryza and bleeding were higher in group B. In a subgroup analysis, the two kinds of Peginterferon-alpha-2a available in Iran were compared. Rapid and early viral responses and relapse rates were lower in the one made in Iran and the long-term responses were not different. The rates of arthralgia/myalgia, fever, alopecia, pruritus, insomnia, dyspnea, anorexia, cough, headache and abdominal pain were higher and the rates of irritability and coryza were lower in the one made in Iran.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no significant difference in the efficacy of Peginterferon-alpha-2a and Peginterferon-alpha-2b in Iranian patients. Physicians might choose the treatment regimen for every individual concerning the differences in side effects of Peginterferons.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Hepat Mon Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Hepat Mon Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article